From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 30230 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2021 22:32:01 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 17 Jan 2021 22:32:01 -0000
Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]) by 1ess; Sun Jan 17 17:01:01 -0500 2021
Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id b2so15452317edm.3
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 14:00:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=P6zWQxhcDKysFTtNucX0lnZCzCwRPgEh+wyXL/qhxdA=;
        b=GzgQC7M5Afe7Q5KF7t24INQwc4mBSREiUJskAN+psPGTxh83GELuhIvkHPXmGGaInM
         sZJnDGkjh3aj0Q+WudCRDv2VDCwETjSU1jEhBqAEKv4EjAuEBRp87E+PxmVUkfopFGwA
         aI08QeAWs456JnjseF1VL7Pv3Ouf9V9PC/UBUCFX/ffP+sMjgI+UYn3o33M2ynUd7GLn
         TuHFAhdHqaWIjqIdqaK3Ody809jDqoQA+yhqqNJ5WOrdWzhrJfgwe0p3J+E9hDwf7xsR
         eQPgjfhHw85+4PWGskb37EwTUHFa8By9VFCANqarbtcvucTY4dmIzPu6yueMWd0SE097
         VC2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=P6zWQxhcDKysFTtNucX0lnZCzCwRPgEh+wyXL/qhxdA=;
        b=gDMHIq/bnuOlzwcagfkxEJK/mJwZy0Lu/GVROY+5iu0o7GaNbgTItr9PJon96ENnav
         dhiHaDbhpMpCAp8v33R+clTDz6gSnhBtBMthgN0JB8Xkzvs2bVjQbDlOmApe9CoKGRx2
         qPcXQbI4z7ykpaDu/2I8rGw5txerjg/Bdb15Kj64Y3YCALxGg1ipkrE1bAX6KCvX1QUr
         YV2hh02ebudDl2gmeaEDDWsQscwp0NckMbm2ZB+Y6YzV7jwZGlKCv47qxUue5uZgT80L
         O+Wu5dRjoKLZdB1LWEDlT0pSatQycxKQUbTTmWosRI67bztmFZkZNhZtsvOP9/Fl9KmO
         RQjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HgDK8HYYK4vlg7V9cSc+m4gq7rJBHw/4ns8Iw+spsQPuw9u8W
	lNB0UvJH1TddpQLaIpC/KcCWOhjyAUNMugz2Y6JcW5cJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYb2Tj4J/OXB9W5UU9UwyP49ndTdxugOoNeeP7Im9EZ5KfWgOJgD5HYiqeq4VZtcJrNOYtXK8VNGUHzeUftc4=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d6dc:: with SMTP id l28mr17496979edj.105.1610920850639;
 Sun, 17 Jan 2021 14:00:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f91:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 14:00:49
 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20210117201113.0a10783d@gmx.de>
References: <YAH9/l8XX8aVrQt2@alice> <D52F15AD88DB75114466C9D39C224342@5ess.inri.net>
 <YAONqQxAZ0+CJAtd@alice> <CAFSF3XOERBCVH_ZL6kmvPtQxh=EvKhP0m0OkeJPxnG5ifBjqXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210117201113.0a10783d@gmx.de>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:00:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XMBQTJoeicEz0auHViE7m2yJuMLxwb2TO1H_3GabYccGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: agile RESTful service-oriented interface deep-learning-based locator 
Subject: Re: [9front] Re: fqa: request for requests
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

eckart, what's the problem, we can all have a teambuilding event at
some gulag now!

and if you can't look over this superficial shit then you're wrong here anyway.

On 1/17/21, Eckard Brauer <eckard.brauer@gmx.de> wrote:
> as that discussion seems to suck here for a longer time, I'd throw in
> my 2 cents too.
>
> There are 2 very good reasons I read that list for (I'm not yet in a
> position to attend in the form of a writer, as I currently can't
> contribute much): The technical brilliance in a (for me) very
> interesting topic and it's humour, sometimes black and close to the
> borders, but usually far from politically correct-isms.
>
> First of that remains, but if the list is going to change to one of
> those softwashed and political-correct-dogmatic do-gooders lists, it
> starts to read more like a communist manifesto or the like, something I
> won't read for sure in my sparetime. That would degrade the before
> first level tech topics to 2nd level, and install or enforce a sort of
> wording check barrier at 1st level.
>
> Regarding the mentioned "shoah jokes" - it's not my sort of humour, but
> please keep in mind, that doing jokes with such topics is usually not
> really an expression of fun with that topics, but more one of shock or
> as a try to cope with the shock of something unbelievable, unthinkable
> or unimaginable. Nobody would usually expect people here to justify what
> happened in Shoah, even if we don't know personally, and as long as it
> doesn't take over the common language use here, I'd rather read even
> Shoah jokes (or other maybe inappropriate sentences) that way and keep
> discussions on political correctness of speech far outside.
>
> Up to just last week I was glad to learn from you all, since the start
> of exact this discussion it started to taste damned frowsty...
>