From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19402 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2021 02:55:08 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Feb 2021 02:55:08 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by 1ess; Sat Feb 6 09:15:36 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id w1so17474313ejf.11 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:15:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xjTXKeVTYY85/Rixq0S6XhtfloK0OywALVgAvR7lALI=; b=S1CTkdY3AP6dCydklePKE9gEMSAR7ceyN5UQfA3LA3Q6/DpKKlAYGZRQDv3tT0jkO+ G0uSTyVf1Ooykygf5NedfVo2ZGlIJIZG2xjtmo2lxulX8LqZXxejeTwND2ATBlv2BSAp ymdOobZnwFzxPoirP2zzCIUgSbu8hNqpDuYCGM0zptDGj1FSPpNrB7mVmGos53jMHISn Kedndq9QPqciX0tLCXrjaoxXbovhU3KvkjOyDSvFNHYGX3UY6ZRdolWvny7EDp+qGhNh fPBT5+fTFB2vFO3CfFQL7h/yrb211os2480rUljn6bQBibFHD5KT4DwFCp3S9PO7mQG8 TUSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xjTXKeVTYY85/Rixq0S6XhtfloK0OywALVgAvR7lALI=; b=pS30yCaZ5FWFf/Ova+snRfyOscDnAFaM6Kc1rDXSxEUZOuMAnyRvkKngsDNEwxkWQJ pMani5UVLJIArQHXwrzgjUbP/sD3SoUXTgg7UiwJsN25gVVhM65T0v5Gn7gwwc0Louh+ ZNNGu5nK1TYvq5rw74FdA/vfn/btsTmtThFSg5Po5f4t1FK6Bs8KRxVsNQisqzKDp3R8 2fHf5PwHJ6k0g7IDiXiAQRhrPRbxORbTx2sZYQYNGQWHc603PqD4MIO0Hnfj6rFAHshr CGrr5C+D9wWAPfzXCq+ijDAsTvBqcu/+xXdJM69Hudg705xhZk9aMPoza4UFzoaOl9o3 dyDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532R//GFAgXqHUY4eH72mJ2Bs/hR/HNwkdpVgGUzCLtvSa26iaMA J5J3Yafj9R6/GOejguIQBhQkBMcbb7NGX0asm+mBWOhqfLA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaLYRY1q/n8kYMls/Nvf/XWPCLE+LHmZVetRsymLukRw5ZtZTxp1Xrkenu/iRFUQXMDeyzT1ivLmtrGZ8FVac= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94d4:: with SMTP id dn20mr9013873ejc.397.1612620927289; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:15:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:3957:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 06:15:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 15:15:26 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: cache component hypervisor Subject: Re: [9front] maildir history Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk 9front upas is all based on erik's nupas code. afterwards it got modified a lot, so much that it might be a rewrite would have been faster. steve: not sure i get your specific question: are you asking if mdir is better than mbox? if yes, then i would agree that without more tooling around it, without indexes around it, our mdir format is still not a very accessible mail archive, but if you make your own indexes and some tooling i think it's much easier based on mdir than on mbox where you would mostly need to do byte-wise seek offsets as opposed to file-granular read operations when you want to access a mail.