From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32318 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2021 16:29:18 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jan 2021 16:29:18 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by 1ess; Wed Jan 6 11:23:15 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id qw4so5708580ejb.12 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 08:23:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6I3lRuSlv4KdIsQbTIup32v7MMIMsZvKL9dGiNotIJA=; b=hYNwGKPvI0kBdeMMIbDlnP9CCzW2JheOxiS3jGSmgB37aVDgPKyCP5vG5pHQslGb/u XxTkBGw8/QP3W4JN6089TuR/3o0G+iTvDXtUX4PVkF+083cV0UVO1d+q4ZBMQqNcida6 UWcD0EXrtVrKu0iSjHsMmHs+JdXeKtJE3Tl4gL07bTv4ClZNnexOppn/oAjfHn4bGSNT n3QAVeh228Ly6ITLTn3cKtxDQIJkj+xoQt49oaBkjwDeMhHVGzU1aN7gEvOGlHTMVvH2 uIgmJ0fbZIt6rA4AWCuxF6v4XKQIQlxgbnxD+Eo2HMjHAtu2NnHRU9DD2+iYT2UNJ5Ab PsoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=6I3lRuSlv4KdIsQbTIup32v7MMIMsZvKL9dGiNotIJA=; b=B18FhgMQaLAHprqZRoDGJ0HwGLLUfHA6EeqC/RPqY+5Pa/NNzGJ+VQN8WXcWdqiZZi IrzQWUg80oYbonQRf6UNylRdSIRs2SccDkHJPXfSN1OmK+l3s5rxrT8VI1o7UXlqk16G 12FEiLzi/UQi2wZr0o6CS9qtmws05hXPAsAcGT6h+YBjSZ7lzxFx6rRy9npgnsYHOudG 4zvAlYFcqcJso0BIkMwSeyiZ7bewozWuWDnGNOdszsstlYG5fLtg8aos/vAZsQKd/eEG y18HErXP+ylUmn9bpi7ya0uDKUaCF0dookxzGKWNxjuXqt+KIomWfw2hSwzfKHbeF8ZP DIfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kcBgfThKimtB9oxdjg8JS5/lbYMxR43AWgv+kn91xNAe+G7se LlNkuWIj6cEODUKrcyPIf9RxQQHDqkrpYP+w2Bood7cVQSI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw26sLrb9f8zQvuB9ZZWF9r+2z+LJrMQYKD9NHmLPOGRt4/99t8Thm9HgN9i/62BxnjJXOjtTLzLthxsf1ff90= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:958e:: with SMTP id r14mr3474995ejx.319.1609950186029; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 08:23:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:6848:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:23:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9514DC52-9435-44DB-B8B3-2B66609D1318@stanleylieber.com> References: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> <0FAE354A-A6ED-428E-A9E2-E7D439E04499@stanleylieber.com> <9514DC52-9435-44DB-B8B3-2B66609D1318@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:23:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: STM element blockchain-oriented framework Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk i thought gmail would *first* insert a Received: header before they add their other stupid shit. thanks for clarifying this is actually coming from them and not from you, sorry for my confusion On 1/6/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: > On January 6, 2021 4:07:38 AM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>well it's all new to me, too. >> >>dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com >> >>this line, seems to suggest that gmail.com has to go into quarantine >>because of a dmarc subdomain policy. but no gmail subdomain is used so >>it shouldn't apply. it feels like your mail server is incorrectly >>looking at sp=. >> >> >> >>On 1/6/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>> On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be >>>>complaining about gmail... >>>> >>>>On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>>>> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part: >>>>>> >>>>>>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >>>>>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>>>>>header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >>>>>> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>>>>>designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>>>>>smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >>>>>> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) >>>>>> header.from=gmail.com >>>>>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; >>>>>> Tue >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >>>>>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >>>>>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM). >>>>>> >>>>>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >>>>>>> quarantine decision: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >>>>>>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>>>>>> header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >>>>>>> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>>>>>> designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>>>>>> smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >>>>>>> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) >>>>>>> header.from=gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine >>>>>>> should >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> apply >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>> From: Jonas Amoson >>>>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >>>>>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on >>>>>>> netsurf) >>>>>>> To: 9front@9front.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to >>>>>>> load >>>>>>> all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a >>>>>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that >>>>>>> makes >>>>>>> the loading slow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >>>>>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe >>>>>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front >>>>>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to >>>>>>> load, >>>>>>> that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything >>>>>>> either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Jonas >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today. hopefully >>>>> gmail >>>>> will stop complaining once it propagates. >>>>> >>>>> sl >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> you'll have to walk me through that. all i see is google demanding to >>> see >>> our papers. >>> >>> sl >>> >> > > i don't understand. i don't think my server is writing that line at all. > there is no mention of dmarc or quarantine in the ups source. the stuff > you're quoting seems to be coming from google. what am i missing here? > > sl >