From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12220 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2022 19:45:57 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Dec 2022 19:45:57 -0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.221.172]) by 9front; Sun Dec 18 14:44:04 -0500 2022 Received: by mail-vk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id x65so3437910vkg.11 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:43:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MeziQlQ9nAJwvy9f5yKuRLzJLRM2OAxwPqu8knfKRbg=; b=Xq/phl+uxssHufY2I/R1fCGpYBgd7h2gOHRZRZLUcB5gIk7f+VD1wfoZLRg5YmMuGt 1fgeU4t6zDu7UYjLr6ZgNo77/eCgJeY8otmFH2281grqy5jPPLO2rZqIDj0wOeuqSEFk MDcXL+1I/MiLQ4fy2QadMbgu5awJWDNRwPmKm41DL5ZOY6Xi5uHNNew5E2Se+lTal994 NLScxO2yF+zMZB/Wus/mHEKb5dOJ6WCurifljAO7FEIVUKeHPdB7hrqNvKFaKCTKFFq9 xQq8mMUOP8JDS2wpBHwBc5wSohjrP+RWvqo1/Tb6QF5SiPEQ0nULtHC13sJ/ZFFCUHhK 2oLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MeziQlQ9nAJwvy9f5yKuRLzJLRM2OAxwPqu8knfKRbg=; b=f/iBePE1VQXYeVJof6FYmO7qv1+7O5p3e4qW+/Uy9Fl2hkXkW6Nb8I82tuuknhKUAt jl9qr4WqQYVZ2/b62kpZmYkGEGiWiraOEvPRTmlgJaHvWZGwFOw/OfuoObWVTbMlbFwr 63AzlAE/n3aDBTPbJb7zHfSKNUeIaT33zYi0p9JPl8vHcAJ/Sp4/lM5ePj7HY/FXfsZF 8yZQmBb8WXwD1Bj2CfOSZFoV0MLoa/JMI7STgmBL9DRKjUagcy6B1/HdgjerDigcHgvY aZAL8yKAajutUZIkNA8SQpoqa5K1vZPsAbmDEyiKKTUKwGemgpnGMtyvkV6hLWkYsKQW 6tHA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plKu7h2QB3wA0IzKTa74dsDcUU8FxvFQUio+badsJmY5Kyf++k8 U80SArArbKvI8W/EAM91BCkofmnBTyrtQUGR+aisz4SUc8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4v51wg0fdvuG1Ggf393ZnTNyT9xrKhmiWLKrgavSYTR4mmUfvEj9Tn63XjIhlw6Mcf69vF8h9mhqeyrR9TPm8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6345:0:b0:3bc:65ea:864f with SMTP id x66-20020a1f6345000000b003bc65ea864fmr49926571vkb.30.1671392638926; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:43:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:60d7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:43:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:43:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: descriptor self-signing TOR over SQL grid NoSQL controller Subject: Re: [9front] cwfs footgun Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk so i toggled twice here, and i got: "none disabled" as the last line. i guess that means that none access is disabled? my cwfs config block (first block at beginning of my cwfs cache partition) doesn't mention any "nonone". does this mean after a reboot none will be enabled? On 12/18/22, Stanley Lieber wrote: > On Dec 18, 2022, at 2:20 PM, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> =EF=BB=BFcan somebody please elaborate on the risks stemming from "nonon= e" ? >> >> On 12/18/22, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: >>>> will existing installations who were setting nonone via /srv/cwfs.cmd >>>> now >>>> be exposed until >>>> they set nonone permanently via the fsconfig console? >>> >>> yes. >>> >>> -- >>> cinap > > by default, when cwfs is listening on port 564, anyone can attach as user > none. nonone disables it. > > sl > > >