From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17363 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2023 12:14:27 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Jan 2023 12:14:27 -0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com ([209.85.217.46]) by 9front; Fri Jan 20 07:12:53 -0500 2023 Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id i185so5422549vsc.6 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 04:12:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=79GqJXWmxslDta8roTXW8B2VPgI2xg+isAc91dKf8+A=; b=e0Ux4WAZerEWHxB6ZFQzrofi6y57WgKFRANMb+DozEK6YDzZV2Iqf7MQbnvgGmaV/v zAJZBBQjLfXz0dgbcS37QKUxfxVc765Ha+MrDxR8kE63XkmIUTsmbVNvAgIIZiJNueJB n9r6PmXGxsmy786rOfPxo69ZPIrfcT0X1Jy0tomfkwnm/HF2UbPW/NlCMO60vHKqsqj5 Qrb5nx2ZKU7DaIBv5CSv2+zFkN0jG/WkRBONQqMfHbtY8/uZOs9ryy84nJkv4o3g4pVV iXTQufzKaoMfPP05jdOsCV8bj/CIyEaw7UinDOaOIrs1unY3724xlI3z4/GL+6r1acBc I2Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=79GqJXWmxslDta8roTXW8B2VPgI2xg+isAc91dKf8+A=; b=bX+TBHtXvKZKtPrNq18HkQ1z9jCk8p7ya8XX/KOxmOwiNGUhqZIv2T83xYb6S/SVyI BL6ao4WarNUjiN5enGVQ/JEmZJ5g52/KIz2Vpj0pTPWjqL3Z3Blnjk1i7vACd9O/MHah EDW+a0jKlOyzUE99TskmebN3zFbzPe3lg7YU8fMbQr6eYYS+78csxikJ1SEcPyHIRkv3 xj/0bXJqxr66Ao0NFLnf0Z5ONdpog/t/X86zLosv9nRuABv7vqH/uldfLh07Kt6FO3Fn WCZ5bnrNY+QsOYhN40+YPIjicyohh0AixERdcMV84IsTDr8IT20Sn+gQlHbyyaRb/Piu oiqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpxxNsQPEsNIaSjFhuZT2W6OXuMZHqpCVZo/Ac0CJPiQxw3gJh8 LEH5vs2slObTfiaL0SuVMSaDI2uV+ASyz8jiucqHxUEP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtgGuTC6vN39wtIoMtFQ7zGfbd+iWd5jDwDagWy7/INigqKaDoVybTwy0JgtQcDXC/W94zJ15rfw4Hl0wVKnvg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ce0f:0:b0:3d3:c5a3:ae94 with SMTP id s15-20020a67ce0f000000b003d3c5a3ae94mr1972396vsl.75.1674216769245; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 04:12:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:5a66:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 04:12:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87988F72F1C2D20B16DE8DA47FB8C262@alice> References: <87988F72F1C2D20B16DE8DA47FB8C262@alice> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:12:48 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: progressive managed rich-client cloud Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] libsec: add minimal support for the tls renegotiation extension Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 11/10/22, Anthony Martin wrote: > OpenSSL 3.0 clients refuse to connect to servers that do not > support the renegotiation extension (RFC 5746) why? what's the logic behind it?