From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24393 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2021 22:19:57 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 19 Jan 2021 22:19:57 -0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 19 16:54:40 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id c6so16254322ede.0 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:54:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ruNMYRqZ7nROXRPJJ5rDXC3LvNliPr+VjQLaLoKxPnM=; b=HlgRb8lFlMh+g+9Pnxt755EVK9aBJg80SQJlklN3CyI1J+VG1axhowYVO+us1roSG5 vRcdIpAWOEQuvd2clSD5JxBKOQ8Peggz30L9lf1TyC9ufi9tzFCn4HXESCqFXfWKI2gt Mi8cgKAiRZ5q9L+q+TWvQ3uvj1HHanTJshkxm71w7pmpNIbXIs33E0LvRKlvVVB0psc6 +6gULyQyhHLUqr3q4zp0/qQCZ/LSKtGWy5pPmLtzGPRovKo0KCmrfAtuRRiWs5qOrx4Y v1/KJMd30OKXQZcorrBz5/zmd2SZIk9pLEv7IZcHp91BGHVmfRU1FCgK7TB8b9UZlu1/ tzww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ruNMYRqZ7nROXRPJJ5rDXC3LvNliPr+VjQLaLoKxPnM=; b=e9tPgpdOGwc9l4ONsnOK3jckTcsY7Ix+k4mNJ8gGhlty8g/fu4lBMzPr0NUmIYYUfU u/J6Ga46Hr6ci4GFWKN8OdfXXB1b0ydvMGz90hM/BK9IIcvrwhi7qRa/H0YdGOTvi4oJ xkwghD33Cc6Qg9kKw9gQu+7Xz9mfwm3RlfeA3ol8b+RScqfkmqiR0YyDGeqH9T8yHwYn 2KubJkwOxLd2SHn8UbacJ86AK562UvJj8a3N9jeg7xRYN7LIKWgTymQpARUh7kVNM4qb sw3aj46mvD719G12iHitoHrLVfWV7aiXnLsCErOf6W3fHQyE/VeiHf/kLpQJpFfOVzCG Lnug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315iifwz23yTYptKzOGNfnZsDPAc6S4n9xHdT5YL/uQzO2j1scV P5aNeULYVj5mV9yh4rVfbklaqMDpoZC9fNeB6GKS3eEMHJE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxebnNHn2taACjXoBizXcNX8N8au99KIK+lNKER5/JwwPdy9uqRuN7qbKev5kRkkkdvo/PFVP5FdMhK0Xg5+uE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3122:: with SMTP id dd2mr4925790edb.262.1611093271621; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:54:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f91:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:54:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5AEC3297-201A-46C2-9B80-F5471F80EF26@stanleylieber.com> References: <2A888CF9-DEBE-4DFF-A68D-0EE4086EA8A5@stanleylieber.com> <5AEC3297-201A-46C2-9B80-F5471F80EF26@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:54:30 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: content-addressed strategy-aware high-performance reduce/map high-performance solution Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk i was under the impression that cwfs, like hjfs, wrongly allows access. do notice that the cat in my example succeeds and prints date. it shouldn't IMO. On 1/19/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: > On January 19, 2021 3:57:29 PM EST, Silas McCroskey > wrote: >>ah, missed the "owned by user none g+rw" part. >> >>Same behavior: >> >>mystia% ls -ld /usr/none/incoming >>d-rwxrwx--- M 5300 none ftp 0 Nov 15 2016 /usr/none/incoming >>mystia% auth/none ls -l /usr/none/incoming >>ls: /usr/none/incoming: '/usr/none/incoming' access permission denied >>mystia% auth/none chmod 0777 /usr/none/incoming >>mystia% auth/none touch /usr/none/incoming/file >>mystia% auth/none chmod 0770 /usr/none/incoming/file >>mystia% auth/none cat /usr/none/incoming/file >>cat: can't open /usr/none/incoming/file: '/usr/none/incoming/file' >>access permission denied >>mystia% >> >>- sam-d >> >>On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:51 PM Silas McCroskey >> wrote: >>> >>> mystia% auth/none cat /usr/glenda/secstore >>> cat: can't open /usr/glenda/secstore: '/usr/glenda/secstore' access >>> permission denied >>> mystia% auth/none ls -l /usr/glenda/priv/ >>> ls: /usr/glenda/priv/: '/usr/glenda/priv/' access permission denied >>> mystia% >>> >>> anything more specific to try out? >>> >>> - sam-d >> > > i first noticed this discrepancy back when i was first screwing around with > /mail/queue; i mentioned it, but nobody was interested. hjfs just honors > normal file permissions. at the very least, shouldn't all our file systems > treat user none the same way? > > sl >