From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E7253B5 for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 22:14:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by 9front; Sat May 18 16:13:12 -0400 2024 Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f2e3249d5eso5742695ad.3 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 18 May 2024 13:13:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716063187; x=1716667987; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3mgrHJVGHQxl/UnHhHjxZnvfucZ5O6xqHeLdJE0Q3hM=; b=GpeoO0X5s6jbCEUItdWsmRiMzQQDNvvvkHrQI6G3J6HhtVecf8CQ2lS98akbTAl8KI DBvCLkC436LsNxuhAoxIpf6gatfQ6STsqxu/ISo6lRzgwPnc7xWpLSVTIjgmMk8MOWjl ve8apBB1izs1lHHZWV7ei7gLIQX+c6jNpTTOsxVZyTGYB+DCQP7RFc1Z9SczClQQ4aZM CVDNu55ybAuDabLK8vbgRwAl0+2nAR/QJ0BtbGCi8eOy0s0PB5T3jaeY3ccuQSNRsJ9M rWwS3kODiXktaRsCgG+ClWW7jC77JgzZVVbVjLCYFaWz6FfXBVvA/pPiMZB8uexgfoe4 uS2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716063187; x=1716667987; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3mgrHJVGHQxl/UnHhHjxZnvfucZ5O6xqHeLdJE0Q3hM=; b=xHuPvClHR+tcIJYnWGXtA5N2mJApUy8iTasjN3kzrVAzFzX0dtPU/AMZAM8bykjDZi 3rRakTv3oNWdiBTQh+oef5osixqxroZRagbjCGXbg58+fUieh9A4ZeKt8U5l2ZWVHZuz wzSoh+hVKTlgeNOMNUcurPRETg0dtpACj+fcugcc+SodfFkh3xH9s5mtDUflh74yvM4+ mhxFu9ZAhIrsmQ08efyUAyLREEFLYGBKqeRhstV+7M3ST4dvB+32i9bZ93DBvN2nNPbY ektsVREuUo9+3dm5xuU0x/ff81Ln2/hIy8iwOUIg01miwp4fgp8s/UmDy6jGST+jOLNd 23VA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcNLFupHbIafzG9PSz849TBEYBItXopPGlVOdJyNwTU0+IcAWK gjVf4S+SnhV8Vah4Z8kT+BQsWipeJPJ5o1DSDByzP8RHNP4W44Ph73dXN8x89CktE0VJ23S6EPS bHDbPB317hijcE76LaBwWTz0cFC7VWCYfXW0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtcHhdBfilfHPgw6hwsugN9BS1su3pSCUHyBwfLX+dq8oRI0UDlccXz1ETLuJh4vzaAMKgP8t5pddnL4aUp3Y= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:354e:b0:2b5:fce8:59ef with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2b6cc452fb7mr24344962a91.1.1716063187036; Sat, 18 May 2024 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <896a48b3-c76d-4535-9993-cb0db007050a@sirjofri.de> <4CDB6FC9B4D6CCE8F25B41E12F049AF8@eigenstate.org> In-Reply-To: <4CDB6FC9B4D6CCE8F25B41E12F049AF8@eigenstate.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 22:12:55 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: responsive non-blocking callback grid method-aware framework Subject: Re: [9front] "Insecure" icon in gmail Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk + syslog(0, "smtp", "ignoring cert for %s", ddomain); then i guess, debugging is off on the mailserver? On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 9:41=E2=80=AFPM wrote: > > on one hand, I don't like doing it, on the other hand... I guess > we don't have much of a better option. ugh. > > committed. > > Quoth sirjofri : > > 16.05.2024 12:28:35 cinap_lenrek@felloff.net: > > > > >> 3. Would it make sense to add a flag to use startls but not validate= certificates for upas/smtp? > > > > > > yes. i think that makes sense. Maybe "-C" as in disable thumbprint/ce= rtificate check? > > > > Pretty sure I have a patch for exactly that somewhere... > > > > http://sirjofri.de/oat/patches/smtp.patch > > >