From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9299 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2022 19:21:44 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Dec 2022 19:21:44 -0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com ([209.85.217.41]) by 9front; Sun Dec 18 14:20:11 -0500 2022 Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a66so6926747vsa.6 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rFuRhmfS2E/967YCZC89OZnltfaMW2VbRBvaUuOB+x4=; b=Ea4H2We7frDSXpSvIh/oHnZR8wHoF0Hyo8D1GULk+11jQt5Ob5dcEw7PUQSnIFaAB/ McN+66Vj8PuURDHdzQuWlJaZfQ5hjd07yBfA5HV84Mn2q9JJ00H1vQJTbU+hwyr7Ab9V FErS5+yeNf4Tq+YBDrfKfnPx14elqJjcqyV9D/wrBkilQffvMZgCr1nDQm4CDHJ3LSVc mmuwp2tBN4zsQCHJ7rPH+EjXUzgEaubVJi+1MJzt3+egzB3HU80R7PSqt0q8HxTTwu1h 8krYsVG7fnnux6MMrYAiGC8/2fRgh9UYZLUM0AZ1Iy30O28u8AYygjFBWEyfF9HBGY2s rSiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rFuRhmfS2E/967YCZC89OZnltfaMW2VbRBvaUuOB+x4=; b=XlwqSuiKfEic6HwpHqtz5u1sVxq5Gj9+TsG/hQQp4byt7OqlE99EOD18ETwGtsrO9N x2rcuDqglW9Vq9XfMgRUsFJwLYsCRKJfoa1epW9/rDfuc8nVtqEX42GhlSI4sCETrIe7 J9w/Ccs3bhWIZrRsA03Hwl/Wi3ymgzxic7JbdjKDP8i2749NSM9OALUL7eN3muQGAj7A 2mdXtoYjBrWqgtedXSVSk4CX0S1jwjIaj5+EStJ19V8Bk0eHasMWH3P0T8gmmxtk131I q3vGeSLIO5RRv3ePgc87bAAbylaVz+8bnYdWLle38J16Ie4t+fOZ4BidGCt4yPjYOFZS taBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnt2fktRluPNdoHJibrs5r3HrjzJ+kIz/9gW58r6XzWd5XBtV9k lXvBUp2Iqm6ELyhsuya/z+O+giDtrk94qvw8W4W3e2j3BqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6y+tXzuJal4ZIfBYiRck0LM45SrM/dovHCyyBY7p/PnrBVJjYb/jPa2u5Smr/sOFCexayWOhpgtuXyYzsDcms= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ef45:0:b0:3b1:3676:fd01 with SMTP id k5-20020a67ef45000000b003b13676fd01mr13503208vsr.83.1671391207150; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:60d7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <561BC1364EC96AE0EDFA48AC1C4E3051@felloff.net> References: <561BC1364EC96AE0EDFA48AC1C4E3051@felloff.net> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:20:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: callback API-scale descriptor Subject: Re: [9front] cwfs footgun Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk can somebody please elaborate on the risks stemming from "nonone" ? On 12/18/22, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: >> will existing installations who were setting nonone via /srv/cwfs.cmd now >> be exposed until >> they set nonone permanently via the fsconfig console? > > yes. > > -- > cinap >