From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by ewsd; Mon Sep 21 13:16:49 EDT 2020
Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id e23so18853417eja.3
        for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=7KzYbkSa3PnavRURuHQzC3B0J/AsxUgTKvy7OWbZIiE=;
        b=BMxByUNwOZMauCyjdq8qAQKb1F5IFeqniaSfZXszYEjLldYNKYb6M++pzw6JH/FmkY
         q6a5biRZJEaALftjBS7XM61rN4ZESbnUtoFM0WBtNkc7RBRI32LWVBmfiSJ9UqicGU/X
         dqjEAKA3NRHyunndh3XgUWq/N5MIzFvXsKSukQGFhWuovBJv0tW/I6qN8TKawO34tYCk
         EjuEPZI9l6bKjR7Hz95tEg6LtFcFs5Ea5RTsA14yflHB16lhONOANmFUtg6+f2jgH0eb
         lXbDvhmUbvViuvp9keP6jlwsyb+QldPuViG4tNqQ1SmjPO7VxxuD+mf60O5RVAJrhkKm
         viuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=7KzYbkSa3PnavRURuHQzC3B0J/AsxUgTKvy7OWbZIiE=;
        b=b3OMDQCC/sdTMPMAYR0M0lqXS6gQd9tImvFATw1FjArmnKHPlHXiE6oQcSSTNLO64H
         gaaU/CZradXqbW9vyEvumNTKzcEhIJuTlpZwqPhXKs6ywwftZSPONx7hrLM7XuXnf4A9
         KWBJu06bo0bBiSkkFfCbxGZ/XZiJHWn9/3OWwYgDv86Eb6XTO0Exhu9MbbMlHQ22P61z
         2uWWoTU8L3XOBUmADrnuKTlc/Lv9it/L8cq2UVoo71+CZTmdv0crus2+UPLDj9gtVTvY
         K2lkUYSmEnq7y/qEYOUMo0bXVV9wwm1EePwfG3zQY7JNdB4VwboaKuD8WnF5r1ZH6pfr
         9S7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532r7W5M8d3YszjR7H30NYFmY8VVyAmPo8IyPOzhuSYwdzH8V88Y
	01XV7qLqXmpR5Q01eMDeptSQ3wfYj6s8pDJMXbBQtDfd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/Oa/f56/vD3pnvikKxbS+9AtWPNkho6Xb8E2g6Qjp5tW3LgFH6q3p+JdBUuT+Vqk+2GHckPRlxmOwBkTjETU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6805:: with SMTP id k5mr426825ejr.397.1600708599546;
 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:906:29c2:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:16:39
 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E7F5FC19-4A77-4EB6-B3FD-AB54351F00D6@stanleylieber.com>
References: <1E3083B627E4EDD1DF08AA61E95E4DA2@a-b.xyz> <E7F5FC19-4A77-4EB6-B3FD-AB54351F00D6@stanleylieber.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:16:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XN61coRw2sDyUv7LiYp+mtaW-cSL4UweZ7CSZ7ZMQq9Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9front] test
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: self-healing pipelining deep-learning manager 

this example has cleared up for me why gmail does such stupidity,
sadly they were misleading and claimed the spam classification was due
to "similar to other spam".

i can confirm that most of the incorrectly classified spam messages i
get in gmail seem to have dmarc not set to none.
i checked a few exemplary senders, one of which being a web forum with
quite a few messages every day.

gmail itself also has it's dmarc set to none.

so while gmail wants to force you to use dmarc (unverified, somebody
claimed that on irc once) they don't seem to think anybody should have
to act upon it in any way ;)