From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4233 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2021 10:21:41 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 22 Jan 2021 10:21:41 -0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]) by 1ess; Fri Jan 22 04:54:06 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id g1so5848382edu.4 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:53:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=asWWX5fJsmmSCk4yhHlesvHm56xt7gjDKMSvvJMvBi8=; b=gQyFhWOcH7dDyN9qavuzs3NtivFrqsAD6ATng0oYovZxcwBWKDabDRd8rw7FD3KLI6 m/mVxiTHSIQZnRI26U30fmaDhtQ2oCGKwMvyGTDtt7fakdRBZJHn2jTrjBcI5xK6hkWw WwDjxQUHMTPZUoXPpi8JP3AKZQKBs/IiOwTTgomKeh1tC6wQSrHaUP7Ghty9wTuCgZC6 2LNCizYGoTf+by4ChPOKk8szQjPlgP9boIMr92MkI7ltc4FGe+nPIDRsfZweXhwJFzqu xqq79ztyWmkW8gwJbAdBQ/g8B/k5B8CKbiyqu9iwquTZjkFBpyQ0W2a6Lq4nroGHy20q oALQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=asWWX5fJsmmSCk4yhHlesvHm56xt7gjDKMSvvJMvBi8=; b=tvA+Ko/FMhWefh9yvSwjW17sK512Xhl9XdHDjzzlu9wOZF+UZofaxJKOC3cJblBnG1 R3+ywWGOnVTgIm12FkXDOGdRYefBEsgPHBLaeiyadTSvys4Hi/uFk3DYWjQR8XW5LaKt n9+YxkMbtbzgCdS8UIwnLgTqlitcjwq17RteS3CNjlWwh2NB3Nh7OS9n4LaOSda+DMZx JyHyB/gSaLBwjy+gg7TODZhuolkWiFZLJ5x4qJvKloJSUU2vf3X71eaeGEmBd00lWx35 mLaWTEUKOTgkJKpaj52NKGQebKdn61UrdsHcXL1RxnU+E9Tm8kzTi0AmeLlqt20c6nkq gP5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cwCuIgjcUJm7PH7sPaNhV9camsi4l60YKIoV21XpaBmvWtGKh WKoIkh1G4hDliTwOYltFtbI2c3QzNqlhiyi0X1PQGKQbkKE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzANvn0pX78rSDhwhjn1reMis5ZAAt7oHUXyQSXlCx/0wf8teQylzwkAQI4LM/rxpnnUmv3ALiJU1B8EVLTBBg= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c94a:: with SMTP id h10mr115865edt.247.1611309237045; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:53:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f91:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:53:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10AAEA9F-8315-443F-80CB-150974BF054A@stanleylieber.com> References: <8810E8F846CEF25EEA2C33E9D750FA3D@eigenstate.org> <10AAEA9F-8315-443F-80CB-150974BF054A@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:53:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: object-oriented ISO-certified just-in-time HTML template firewall method-based database Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > /mail/queue already has to be chmod 777 yeah that's definitely fucked up. did they have another way to separate /mail/queue from the users ?! that sounds just wrong, regardless of how we change none or `rfork m` behaviors. > the man page sam-d quoted seems to disagree with the source. yeah, that's bad. > people reflexively blame observations such as these on writing rc instead of c, but i tend to ignore sic bigotry in light of the fact we've got more fundamental fish to fry! remember, even rcpu is based on rc :D