From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6E62350A for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 18:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]) by 9front; Sat May 11 12:42:40 -0400 2024 Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2b370e63d96so823066a91.3 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 11 May 2024 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715445755; x=1716050555; darn=9front.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Kj3PLheh04WBt+pqOYVPiYeLIWas7CEWJQOkAQHu9kc=; b=MxBiwDDAGRum70Sj1CSaTFkqkUQPRCEJwmgcseoSEhGqW6HfuAC98rZxjNdRIX69MO 6d/+xr5vnPl72EfCdJ0A9g7P1WhlZbTjJtX5a2Gv4RffLaiSuhtJSLi9TWU+ITCsKS8g DoNhuzqiirhm4bBb9lhC9CSsUy3EtEPwfsloXSBnkE53Rk29ifIVUM1YJ9c3+6IPylqL 3lR+q/aPwtxlj7qrq0aUzjyiVy+t7gHqXwK26a5Uw6zbeoBuMMen7WrefE9plRTAUwm3 KYLjPMgSym0idxhaN8WP3V8yW+gl2rklP/DKMGOc1lgJBpK8eOdTLd9vdvDURlpgn6we F0zA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715445755; x=1716050555; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Kj3PLheh04WBt+pqOYVPiYeLIWas7CEWJQOkAQHu9kc=; b=V7l4lWxH4JHWDw66/KXQX/zO9f6zNvorjOVFYHeG4DQsJq16eNDaz6zrXWqmbIqEbG 3BFQVX43aEeIprnkAj7ud8yzcqQ8mMiGyvhq/1jxUUcAvvIVyOJkgpDZvPpUxACKaVLm +ZofFSAhCXNF+kua0JwSpbdQcISJyyT+htW79cpiTbX6zi5k1ELy4BtiOQlSIyredEBi C3zfbgi0wIQlk54h7i0P6rW7vodSpqJsZvW9Adfr3PAxnC8vSzs+MBCYWteSD62HOpki Tb/Sp1nCCyMmVPfbo31fLBB6MoL25RVBLXHgsuosEcSw3FgntxhLB/QGC+8OStM9c20L HDOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YynBWLLV6pgmgee7EWJZAWj8dCNK0XP/GuDZJNzWrWCyY4TrgPZ OFqiqyLuBTaC8lgjCwB1MQ4+oic8VAbJBmXu40V8KgUytaiaaSegMRnTy/iNkWH/cU0RVXdxtkc FUu4YmdewqqhUnuvJnAE12zzF1DO55w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRSRKofEh/jsg2VPzhi43IstotAPdGVtCms/uKbxBSKGRfIERqmageMCGScxlHJjUhCQE2Au4z0f+MvOXWv34= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bd0f:b0:2b2:4bff:67b7 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2b6ccef5a6emr5410870a91.3.1715445755128; Sat, 11 May 2024 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 18:42:23 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: ISO-certified dependency-aware map/reduce ActivityPub hypervisor realtime-java-aware backend Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] rio: resize border and scrollbar based on font Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > This is not just a one time hack however, this sets a precedent. > If we allow scaling patches for rio then do we also for acme and sam > and mothra and every other graphical program? doesn't acme already support font-based scaling?