From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15164 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2021 17:12:01 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Apr 2021 17:12:01 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]) by 1ess; Mon Apr 12 13:03:30 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id v6so20182994ejo.6 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xbWFtxyT7xNn17K7h8jDjoCAcD8p2XJSotjVbcursZ0=; b=pcUyErRTS1Pv4TslSkrd6Nfy74ItulWZmlOTC+bl43C6UWoM9cusEhRY7vOkoX8bKL MUShyEWgJWXWZO3atXviQivmkEZpsaYRRXyTulwmzqUIAA0/J8fe4exVr4lgvBd5HCA0 0IDmAtKNa39eXGuD4mhKH9plNcDvmbdwIMhLrikonhsoL5B2COUV/OGMbfkn/pbX3Plp LKLIdwEipYrSrP/MTEkhqv7/PS8n4jHUK91qTHpcmlqiVcld5x8EHH7VFZajD/7+LvRb AAYd1N40i+gm5bY7c0T+iQMpi69adzr4HsnSR23fWlAEmO6VXg9k02B4gjY4BgWz8Lyv kk2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xbWFtxyT7xNn17K7h8jDjoCAcD8p2XJSotjVbcursZ0=; b=LyLFJ5WMT6Kz5pFEErkmWTytzc2pYfTkcNHm5vQQQGrEKbP6tiN9gpLevmk7Gghxo2 XqkKEk2pdov9xYta7inMwXR35urlxcdVeJdBiPEDIzxDv/4zWJdWCViy/5YjnrYNIlZ5 3p5KCG6v0f1bl4sOwJnd2t4lYHDZlpXtGeLXRn+qze4s4qioYcY+0YVcY0eUlhgR5h51 tV+YILmSLXDeMkbo/KAK9gKnFeKwpSqFlT8nidEfLPJ9qhbxePFUYU6Ks2DJkyqGkYBu VJbKmu/f9QvuaWp+XYBh8w4BTyXwDGuxDHyF5lfNzMeLDX+SoPPOp40SQb1WaPNHyykL qhlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rLlaojYvYg4zLhvnfMNn+BV7W4t1H8mUx3hu1aerw+czjXVAL I+J2wLUemBUEd3QqC8QArL+rmAWq0QqJtHbrpdxpg9PU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAK3O+rIJ9b3J/P8GB0IrmF2sZ1Hw5JvltWLFMNMm9KBPhvkrJ2WsqQrZWJmpEgJq/j9eDaF27QHF1m8xjqqk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e8e:: with SMTP id e14mr28617214ejj.399.1618247001564; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:03:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:e98:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:03:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: ActivityPub over SSL module rich-client session-scale optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] aux/wacom: prevent "no concurrent reads please" error when moving the pen too fast and support screen tilt Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk yeah, that's an interesting question. maybe we need to implement pid reusal... maybe nowadays it would be fine to be wasteful about this. and where does my hunch come from? werc also wastes processes, and yet everybody seems happy to use it. On 4/12/21, james palmer wrote: > Quoth 23hiro@gmail.com: >> why the reqqueue? bec. of mouse movement events getting reordered? > > i figured launching a new process every time the pen moves is a bad idea. > it will increment the pid very quickly. > > - james >