From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9445 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2022 19:22:52 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Dec 2022 19:22:52 -0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.221.171]) by 9front; Sun Dec 18 14:20:17 -0500 2022 Received: by mail-vk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id x65so3423055vkg.11 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DP1qelkkw90KUtPaHt7mzPA8xS4AEg7BB/XvS+GMfTE=; b=jO0Dmizi+eMlrrFxRlXaBQEHULuw4IsleeeGTU9yPCbPgI5+RKsfNdUvwyAdF3Imvd 5P122CUABx0gUUn8j526+iRhg6/ElbaqHwi29krQQtTVgmvf540WCBmCVsmf5PR10lgi EF0rpEZRAjKhd8acrqWJqrP8h1HRK91hvp35RdHIT5bPCP6EsJ9KQRXTRtemGiBtYMma wYEA+Yv9EzZ8e/a0BFaHBkXnaiaj+TjzqPMrlfOgkARpAAiQH5WjV2x+Zw50A0F4KkRX gtIWKEIlEE1HnnebdPJvMjeYiBr1vBflQaX3qUvbEXhWj9lwsvIrixfcyhGv8/FFU8gp yA0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DP1qelkkw90KUtPaHt7mzPA8xS4AEg7BB/XvS+GMfTE=; b=X0bwgHw/EmVX+12bHEk395t4NGPDIH/uNDCQJS1nLvy6MPTxhG8rXQGy/YSojkuQjB ApdaX9mZMfMWs5kQPiuNaY6cWemE64J4I1344IWMR8MHpjI+ImxDmIdPSIywEI8FdA+Q NU9DgBpcOnEA4bURn+yNuPAneK8lvBAK6ROxcZ3prp9pAWDzIWt+xWJB1lfksaJEo8iN tVJRAP+iZY6puWpjHPwa015xQCP/UQcxHYcqeaW1KDjXxDbYGR35O6AW8t62iqvxqCT1 aWUIuL0LZYkdhOklIhDrgtOI9/1BvjcknCd3oikLaQi1aENGudmjsWPkgZQwhzvvCi2D m7fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk6+20Gt2FP0EmQfGVBOOlPBqhldJxUIgjU8F+bMSyO9Z3hdsAe vnqmgXZ9AVDPTysXCKvG/18zjSjFXRZFcf/d+mutsdDW6v4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5AS2CMNvPyIVv/mmsx8+C6XUxSZ71x0NviaunsMvkPlWFpUnOzFb0UjrGhd/lnWzlagL0+NiMyPSbrxC1lbas= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:5f4c:0:b0:3be:70c:a357 with SMTP id t73-20020a1f5f4c000000b003be070ca357mr5042851vkb.33.1671391213327; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:60d7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:20:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <561BC1364EC96AE0EDFA48AC1C4E3051@felloff.net> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:20:12 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: compliant self-healing DOM-aware reduce/map-based interface Subject: Re: [9front] cwfs footgun Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 12/18/22, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > can somebody please elaborate on the risks stemming from "nonone" ? > > On 12/18/22, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: >>> will existing installations who were setting nonone via /srv/cwfs.cmd >>> now >>> be exposed until >>> they set nonone permanently via the fsconfig console? >> >> yes. >> >> -- >> cinap >> >