From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 28122 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2023 12:55:35 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Jan 2023 12:55:35 -0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.221.171]) by 9front; Sat Jan 21 07:54:12 -0500 2023 Received: by mail-vk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id l129so3827383vkh.6 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 04:54:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jLLUWri4SaaCPtqrwJzD2nIfPEjktTSB9ruNekQVJLM=; b=qtEhB+HcDNV2NZJYJjpKz4AIAiO88mmiq25VttdlzqOuYFVac9obLe2DJbt258KxSK GjJBAecrYBN38UP/N51+KXoZ8LzVylvrDR+EjA2pYGSSArIAbptVSijeeQDCNgWJKabS VZVPmLBF6evfMhIZJqwnKzZLE5KBfNsva9kpAi00rwl5N71Mv54ZC1RkrNEImBoAoyyW 39T69oN4YcNJTlK7VM3z5R/z5TElbS0DSvBlNUZFNgZCoryAJ2cMBXcaey3poSjPSmJy m2XTjTfbFC4gD9kMKSMFEDjY4BLQysUSC3zRVnOFMKJW/7bgpnf/+bswiGF+TqSachqt fjAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jLLUWri4SaaCPtqrwJzD2nIfPEjktTSB9ruNekQVJLM=; b=UKE/DuMANGeTntdlwhV5OI82WORa9fQws7T0IzRGP+H8MDx/xJpzoBw2ojiHWbgVCz 9lG53tuye17g05eWYKy5dV2dnDGne1VuhLEk13IWsix77fh0l+3KjvyZqvsgpisaqXAh oXehKfEEJPM71M+uzLkvznZ2E5Riq0V7Omj8SEGsh2H3bWZD5Gtqtms4GbIC7RaDRtx7 kJdpnn7dahSOzlUhQi7PsX+IaX32m877i9wynAUpPI1qHZINOVBFdtDao/I2/2YFkMoQ DDNPG6seFhbf4m4XTjvwme888vg3uD94VvK+srasi7PisK25Tz+S7IeZZJB4TcrwoeL4 CqiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqX/JRPIeU1ORT1AszgeLEBvJKypEz/DD3OL9nz3WTehPpZZnOg o0qepn4ldHoweE17cwpWvDr5+mtskkknFdEyCKFUXsAe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsn2Mc5HHm2zUam7X9+uSxPr1su8P6211dzyMQ3EQXxZ7GFWX3YqQh/1dtjnoUNlaOUK6CEWF6Ouo83ugg4QLI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:1185:b0:3e1:9b14:2c68 with SMTP id x5-20020a056122118500b003e19b142c68mr2422323vkn.37.1674305649171; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 04:54:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:5a66:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 04:54:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87988F72F1C2D20B16DE8DA47FB8C262@alice> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:54:08 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: open-source generic base grid standard firewall Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] libsec: add minimal support for the tls renegotiation extension Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk No, you're right, I just wonder what kept the openssl people from fixing this problem on their side? Since we have unsafe renegotiations disabled, we're doing the right and safe thing. so why can't they deal with it?