From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31945 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2021 09:40:12 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 22 Jan 2021 09:40:12 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]) by 1ess; Fri Jan 22 04:14:34 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id g12so6625139ejf.8 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:14:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0voFFe81X7htUfIUdHRZo7pJvRVoWjOj6/qZj/bttAM=; b=og5TJPYptbQ7YgZLN2jx7HZdo29q1OmOIBXAOP7auOR4/SoIcNGY0wJye0EJBc9lY8 Zh5rIfbqhxVEazFsmb2MLznTb6faO060r9ZtAELRuHk/jhStfNdJ8UKHTyoQ//oIODOt p7BFGvi6Rs50Ts1iIdrmM6RmDyy0e4uLFIv9EtgxJHem4Xxfw9r9IhVCVQkzKCgyQebr KsPYgzxYwnlr7l+z+VvI6yJ6UGUqckiUdd3AYRV8LgiV/PNWL/t2KgnNL6wEeqO4hC0E qqmOmTVWElesVfD7epi/B7seJOzeJ1lFo3QcbzQCBtGLdZAkdTF9lphREPn8S/8vTA81 Vjmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0voFFe81X7htUfIUdHRZo7pJvRVoWjOj6/qZj/bttAM=; b=FV+vDh2RDXvuabHzyWt5EHIgUPW1xe53QqbIclFC8UG9Lrm4YzVNGf3pAwdsQc+hGY 1B+N6k5P5RGb4+Mt+VT7vyMmT8dadESbImw9czSV6PLWNzWnMtZWNufXauAAx2mc1t2p gxU430FzWz+gWqfaLfHDfvpubR9lhMUcXXfypEGfcbv2x5NotLle4MrvycFcQuy+quVj kqOjMjF0ThJFm1rfaKPE/QV5QIAtE/niiaLYrAeS79S/fwq0l1wX5Y9svStyjP1duH/j baCXe6pv1KoR2bOUFs0SPa9ik3PT5tx/6IiR4Oi0QgYPanPPlscgZrZNs9z4jDqneo7x 4g+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jbHhMz6q4EEwvu4zBD8X8i5PHcECSA/FI1lmKbkWAmlS7/9Ul Zjat8YOTxKVZfTXk0yXKaB3PYSHA5P9StQCg1MT/2GTdh64= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4UKgPuN3dOxPxQEMyu9U1OF+8rnqMnVxd+CHHt1keukdgLJG1anLjrT5uhJjifV8c2U7LpQ7RAiQjsElrTzk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b6c1:: with SMTP id ec1mr193965ejb.305.1611306865204; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f91:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:14:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <154A2B81E5307985989F46BE958ACBAC@eigenstate.org> <84C199F8-15A4-4434-AD56-A35AB5CC6F4A@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:14:24 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized engine GPU locator Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > do you seriously not follow what i'm saying here or are you just trying to > map out a solution? i was trying to imagine out loud how the existing security architecture could be utilized as fully as possible. i am not saying it is the best solution, just trying to stay on the track that the bell-labs people have laid out. i am not saying we didn't break it. but if we know the intent of the basic architecture we might be able to fix it without creating a second system.