From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32249 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2023 03:23:36 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jun 2023 03:23:36 -0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by 9front; Sun Jun 4 23:22:31 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-256200b49cdso662428a91.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 20:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685935348; x=1688527348; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VSK8SBhLA+QDAoDNKK0EURLqitfQ2soo+lpQE7Ki1yE=; b=JGze74QXda29N7TnSe/T9g2UnNqC5BeHxgb681Mt5AUFBpiQ4nMaBdUGynbWZHSV3Q wgePxHppgwKQWBgQGMY22mEslYc+dbSQJAPTv6aNNUZttozAdznEmzfw3VmQH7g9zeIt Jtio9pnKZmAU3YgOVfqZuuE+4gb3Tf827GpVGo4DZ6Ba0iISjqspwnR9fRqfi7NiLE1C epIu/R6VOD+DAzt74WFs/l89lqCJsBvOeRyAMmime1NZw3wRPMCjvPJi7zrd6X55/enO U7E199YMmAsNSbMa6mtXa61RosrwcQg5kcScCOh0tqXn86tWUdwCInL75QFkJSDABk76 bv8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685935348; x=1688527348; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VSK8SBhLA+QDAoDNKK0EURLqitfQ2soo+lpQE7Ki1yE=; b=RnTRwMum51dDnpELsGHEZGrzhJD4Bhw/PfKa4c92I4BZ108Pva+dPQH9MYCQ22rnwQ ey8WGOlHdd0itkUWz/irmuxi5SbJkNsQ7kFzJ+DtUeVOJOYQog2LG2DRg9p1CqEsJ9w3 gpW7P5FcZWvWloZLgNDiKroUt6LRCNIJuRG9dHicCzIP/Q412xwtlQPAi777QUBuj2uC LrYv3Y3xlYY4aYvHkjARj8DpQvso2WzFrFnkRywoh/9TGYHg91aai9uFuVe8wDBPeUvE vJesXyoVL8Q6pl5tc7SAXse5QSKBgXmiHt1Bc8LDoAmpo2uuOlaG7BF3Y3dp/A8F0fXC jaVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxmgIQg2iYz7CtMH7bleXKfIBOlnDj3W3+9OPnpk4qacq6WRZyL pCWXV2JFfciCd6jdtTXNPyy50i6B38JPaR1rOg2DLwH1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4yqgvpYYbUX6P65z9TRRIXdGUXlTSm1ULJvcNbQZmSfiweT4MW634c06Tb0OOUWVg6w2uyxleh53S0LipFj7Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:22ce:b0:6b1:63c0:7546 with SMTP id q14-20020a05683022ce00b006b163c07546mr869748otc.0.1685907135977; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:5f13:0:b0:6ab:3652:8298 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 21:32:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: storage SSL dependency-oriented CMS self-signing-scale database Subject: Re: [9front] Free Carrots #6: Tools For Fighting WiFi Inequality Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk so, like a factor 5. 2.4ghz wifi is useless for me here even with linux/windows/android. i live in a higher density area with too much interference from neighbors. 5ghz stuff otoh has much more regular latencies, i.e. less jitter from re-transmissions after collisions. probably mainly bec. the attenuation in our brick walls is a lot higher for 5ghz (unlike for 2.4ghz). also, there's less other crap l ike bluetooth on the 5ghz band. 2.4ghz is way too overcrowded. the big big big downside though is that there aren't many usable bands in 5ghz that aren't plagued by DFS procedures, also making all but 4 channels practically unusable in my area. still, for me, 5ghz still helps a lot, just it isn't good enough when you don't have nice brick walls (i.e. it's great in old european 100 years old houses. but sucks in america). i have high hopes for wifi6E or wifi7 devices with full 6ghz band support. i think once there is a driver and hostapd support for this on linux/bsd, it will become very much worth the effort to try and support it fully. 6ghz stuff might finally become universally useful internationally. On 6/4/23, sl@stanleylieber.com wrote: >> what is the tput result for the "300mbps" bridge? > > x1 yoga 3rd gen w/ ethernet to wifi bridge: > > ; cat /n/rachael/usr/bin/* | tput > 406.34 KB/s > 406.86 KB/s > 433.90 KB/s > 392.23 KB/s > 411.39 KB/s > 426.37 KB/s > 412.73 KB/s > 405.03 KB/s > 415.13 KB/s > 419.22 KB/s > 418.93 KB/s > 418.68 KB/s > 420.32 KB/s > 415.44 KB/s > 420.81 KB/s > 426.01 KB/s > 427.78 KB/s > 431.57 KB/s > 435.38 KB/s > 438.81 KB/s > 440.77 KB/s > 441.46 KB/s > 441.40 KB/s > 442.68 KB/s > 443.21 KB/s > 444.32 KB/s > 446.82 KB/s > 448.58 KB/s > 449.94 KB/s > 451.21 KB/s > 452.39 KB/s > 453.76 KB/s > 454.07 KB/s > > thanks, i've added this to the article. > > sl >