From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22129 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2023 00:17:41 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Jan 2023 00:17:41 -0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com ([209.85.221.177]) by 9front; Mon Jan 23 19:16:21 -0500 2023 Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id v81so6857627vkv.5 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:16:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wOS3BUIal86UFQwcUtOWmr2Mjah7TdxZuRExPicIJc0=; b=I72pr6Pk1lUnpDNJo9ZqC+3pvKPvlgburQ83AYiy6w7mcCEXwE5mVMcuiL2HYzTKqW 2FyZTm/IqOazMTuhE8vfunrujUgFod2LsYhSY/t1Oxv98sKu2q7zYu1hQykj5Onvv0X6 ZGNoI4zBO4urXV5hHdizBybvBbx5uJEX6yB4svxCgSTGaYiB0Iuecqx2l9SF+T4hJl1W DVQGjswu7VwiMwDZ3m2txxaG+YzxKMc8iPkXeHfZdNPlUqQ+rNQ6X7JX/RY+ojhQ322b XGrNgCDBmE3yrNUaqraCHRebk7Q4HbXsJ2QCW8pHuTx3xYAh+fsrzH0buAh6R6wQtGNX OgpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wOS3BUIal86UFQwcUtOWmr2Mjah7TdxZuRExPicIJc0=; b=W2/d/8yDiLsTr68y4aGqC990NHwJZvaXONcw75Tl5NML/dCgjLZO26HaABCNfexGMp BEQJu24hBCtuTzCib8fLun06EB9xiWDXNX524CwdXkC/mMVqGXHpJIB50HWKHwXNQ3eR 41H456kBRys1N9Td4RBCHNXx+0qyo7PtVWYkmxX7P3jdKdr1tvHu9yORmWndWcRBEBzG YLplKAgd0avXEjDoGL+/VEU+cut3JmNlXmDANATQyT97YC8PYIfpDk3UfK2uf1geUS8g Ivly1XGufKSbMEuSW74bHFDGi69mWjcQhxUSnqWzDd/t9t+Wwlbxkwsiz1iSZvS7Fps8 k1bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp5dt6jREXYkQOHAeR64ruf5ByyMHYGrlmTG04C9afPUIo4EyHG 1ooju5r74dTBczogDGbArW9mAC3vg+KW7GmQjFquIHXj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXu2d5xMQbwBvObvheVQKJw3fzKOJGccmrDBkrNUdZHbURArRSXuYCyCJCOTBewZsV60Yaa5lTW35HcEtVKZK0M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:1185:b0:3e1:9b14:2c68 with SMTP id x5-20020a056122118500b003e19b142c68mr3472658vkn.37.1674519377390; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:16:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:5a66:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87988F72F1C2D20B16DE8DA47FB8C262@alice> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:16:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: decentralized RESTful out-scaling SOAP over ACPI map/reduce callback manager Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] libsec: add minimal support for the tls renegotiation extension Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk also, maybe it's enough if we stop supporting tls1.2 ? maybe tls1.1 and tls1.3 can be setup in a safe enough way already? On 1/24/23, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> also, is there no way in openssl to turn off this behavior? > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16278#issuecomment-896157863 >