From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24196 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2021 08:52:02 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Dec 2021 08:52:02 -0000 Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com ([209.85.222.48]) by 4ess; Tue Dec 21 03:43:52 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a14so22541568uak.0 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:43:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3v7OkrSnriNq/sjCYfngQis24BKE91MYIotCeCmepfI=; b=XhDZ0ppD98kzvwSsoYpapPVevaKtEEPqdvIOZGFHZyXxalRq8uE2xUGyPETbQT2+U+ JxU0St+iqC6ztDNbRAjMJoIRp0yrAKtBYqEziZCW0dhPwmUf6TjVqXvxEPcCZTZkQK8W XdaKxg8/RUNExMIbMdhKfFYZ20/AbKlMP2vI9Vkb3esc0a9hZWI1OD8cVZGsrIRxPo0j YOWS4D0+Z8PmPmdxcD7xm/mSdQk7VJmjQK+uMiXsoulp8/M7AsjNC31Al4wJLNcAuPge n/AtkEfbNzzBydnPGkG6ShrMriEJKXwqjbxBLnmjsG5BSn2J+vGPzv4/CrtoQzlzhIag avwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3v7OkrSnriNq/sjCYfngQis24BKE91MYIotCeCmepfI=; b=Y+bsu++QMeio7DRV8reTWjOk+kEispuy9AISOWnTmzXIXblFB5VVAmYC9sqr/aTWDe 9k4611E8vn3waJX7OIp3sr8IBjgw8QvueuafI3b1W8CrBVhX3DuCZuHskYBSzWr9SFhi xbyAc6vDY6cH0qX8zNU+bvLL6KBF7g2uYFu3kQ5l+GDeYOtOVzzduOhpGmw5GZCpjqsj 7INuWk1313r7394ZdeGa9JteuGdQuEVaTIrjXpS8yRjiOQGjMexYNpAJP8ABBJUBlM29 MJpgX+LQm07x/uu0bl76dlyjHbhIi1jYYrF8sQeT8g5WPUMdCV0atvCqmH3hzHRDujfy DWXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IPbv5DUWUQOovHfROih+AXFJIVdan+DRXxi1SMV+NoQF40QBm 1C2l//DrVqjwaR4Fm/tiem+po4SwG6HV4zltZzlBVJOVgXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykKsqYHIv6EP2WJpalqwag2Ky1tj07SkBIXM8AnZhR9FX/fMdnn/BgeBrkwJU7bPHJXatNOqndSrf+tV+HDl8= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:55ce:: with SMTP id w14mr819587uaa.93.1640075828290; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:37:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a59:ab8c:0:b0:248:ba1c:c015 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:37:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <49C07CF0F6C09462FD4B98AA98A47B07@eigenstate.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:37:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: social advanced element-scale hardware control Subject: Re: [9front] Re: hidpi Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk yes, a more neutral scaling factor sounds like it would confuse less people= . and locking in with the fontsizes sounds like a great idea to me! On 12/21/21, Philip Silva wrote: > On the other hand speaking of different viewing distances/ideal widget si= zes > when things should be larger or smaller, it might be necessary to lie abo= ut > mm (or dpi). Another option would be to just define scaling factors so > scrollbars have practical sizes: > > 0 0 3840 2160 2.2 2.2 > > (Also I wonder if making widget sizes like scrollbar widths a pre-defined > multiple of the font height would already work... Or if it's necessary to > scale both independently) > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original = Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > > On Monday, December 20th, 2021 at 21:50, wrote: > >> Quoth ori@eigenstate.org: >> >> > the screen rectangle in size and pixels; >> >> er. in pixels and mm, eg: >> >> # x0 y0 x1 y1 width height >> >> 0 0 3840 2160 527 296 >