Re: [9front] notes on user none

[hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>]

yeah, if making nonone the default makes it all more consistent with
how it was in the labs that's what we should do, i agree.

very nice writeup, anthony.

On 1/23/21, sirjofri <sirjofri+ml-9front@sirjofri.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> imo this is valuable research that should be documented if possible.
>
> This also makes clear the none differences between fossil and cwfs, and
> it's a nice template to look how hjfs works. Sadly I have no hjfs running
> anywhere, only cwfs[1].
>
> This also conforms to sl's suggestion to add nonone to cpurc or
> something, so that cwfs works more like fossil, which also makes the
> system more secure. I'd personally even think about making it the default
> and allow users to explicitly enable none authentication, but I don't
> think my vote counts that much. I'm sure ori, sl, cinap as well as many
> others have more experience to decide this.
>
> just my 2 cents.
>
> sirjofri
>
> [1] the "experimental" note always tells me not to use it. Also I'm happy
> with cwfs and have no reason to switch to hjfs, although users report
> that hjfs is pretty stable.
>