From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20494 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2021 20:42:21 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Nov 2021 20:42:21 -0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.221.173]) by 4ess; Tue Nov 2 15:22:54 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-vk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id g18so181957vkg.6 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B5CHxbvyWy35vbzZ75+KS4UbfgU57jiPvlkds/T/mYM=; b=QplHNg/TgOzYGnFwinE06FeRlv5iX9cgz0jWbWx/Lk0Q3XSNEdo3zWBxgt3sJGR8tn wv5YGBzYzKFNmfL94hb6KuoKL9LDll/wQNQz+y1DqkfM3yxJeRr8W/xox12TllUfat0Z p2vRNwyuBs5o6pyPxogVrx0M1bHwIKPI60BsdhZLpvHiL4xdr7jcVYkgQW0ix7/ZVv6U 87PZu9oBAak70VSIJsBPvbgU8VsOg2OaPNXf3ZhVR36GrzQl5FhbiqCq56a/LnqJYIlR WLgILQOqXf6e6MNun8Vu8PAcxaJYrzQKQdXSJqyYBMFNEaVnYImCzxkP3kMKxOlfUxJs JdUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=B5CHxbvyWy35vbzZ75+KS4UbfgU57jiPvlkds/T/mYM=; b=bMnBs6657HsFgi4V0Ldv8WDk9YZAFdCcYmLECGONKP70rvdiRYw/4yJFHooLl7k4vL mMZy9qAYcFt1vElzmw2GiSC0+GW6M0ATAMLbkV2A8nmcROjLajDLUot2zvP4WhHJtlyg 44XK2tWWESEWQU4aPzdDK9YKZSfkIgTz4b8oHuIKV0Uz+8+6Sx9itm0a85nOmWPdDfxB krGibI2osxGutbMfYy1nOvD1gJEE/OmbLjtEPaKq3PfvuMkQwHzTuH1J9Z3DtDPOfJcW ElLy36+fDmE2eIhl79bErCFUz6qrNlHME55pv3fFRntMCpYmIfSdIqohSswSH76/Z3w5 EODg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PkxJ/QQZwV8ArzbUnrZr4EADONQcWtdNOCLt9Qto1kFEHpYfQ n09HMJaRMxgIsVTfKoitzj5pA0E+N1RYpzAOW5SlQduW X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0vTdrh31pbUhGtNb2O3o2bZtPjE0iAX4R9mTJSqqGIR6SZVFpAH8aA4BtMEt84ONENwl0U+S4Knq+uXXQ/28= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:e6f:: with SMTP id bj47mr14379686vkb.25.1635880967268; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a59:9345:0:b0:238:4fd5:e324 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:22:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EBE77893E9CE3937BDC099792A210A9@eigenstate.org> References: <4EBE77893E9CE3937BDC099792A210A9@eigenstate.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:22:46 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: advanced self-healing AJAX over ACPI callback-scale shader-aware backend Subject: Re: [9front] man du -s correction diff Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk doesnt help when you dont supply an argument. and if you do supply an argument, well folders are also files, so... On 11/2/21, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > Quoth Humm : >> Quoth Kyle Milz: >> >the description in the manual for du -s looks just plain wrong. >> >by itself du -s only prints values for the top level. >> >> The top level being each `file` argument, and the values being gotten >> by descending the hierarchy as always. >> >> -- >> Humm >> > > I agree that the current phrasing is a bit confusing. > What about "for each file" => "for each argument"? > >