From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17818 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2021 09:38:12 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jan 2021 09:38:12 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]) by 1ess; Wed Jan 6 04:08:28 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id w1so3999858ejf.11 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 01:07:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p0kJ3gPZpNbQjz5wgNIyuVjA0xGlaJgFeGyAvmftDUU=; b=M4kxr5VuoZzkzIr3RygOUt2/1hx/xQQ96s27KXkQ6lfM5otRMdsL8sEUKuLycC/z3V VwLtrD68WtUYl9rLwO5WLNo607lsrv+XFLudbyJO7ubDyllaboyEyPJzm3kZJP10qzt5 fNpj1EfDj8k7tbLehOKnJcqoTPzrUltdcG32tZOvvE/hZeoOCS3WZES149dbTtIsW9nh dolyCFhwucslyLlUoLEaPnXkeK9xKRmlgZlpLy62Z8EgsGWXkLKrbHTK/ZPfrTQ+e+h+ izA+TX/BDhENQn9mePeQPAjPKzoCWNnImv5eR6jmS7SID/IbzVNVxl39qYpwwcUG9u0V 2JGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=p0kJ3gPZpNbQjz5wgNIyuVjA0xGlaJgFeGyAvmftDUU=; b=o+3JEOaKauoRCtlAqr/wxg5j7uYSEv8CRkYBEjh+e3035qTzNPzEd8wavgo2N3pHly S4OriAM7MjhD/cyHtFshr+7Cf/OrsylYGs7rZAj95yhxVKHy43CcGVzuf0RGY1U119dU dJRvrbPWYnpeKUR7mte4M/PEgddBoKZRO3+LK3oO8/oeMAEKveCLSwp6iCvnJAV4IMVD eRF1zin5LLG+ujC4MGJyQ27rpXMaf+9wsziaD+FSfkT9ZY4HU7wlEgFTFUqwtWkiCAi6 7Ia5DvfVU6w7caSvmjU8Jz6PvUuFI9no3mjhrehfr8YN6TEV+9PV0VUOjuEyQ5DKkhpQ F1Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HDOZ0O+l3/fDEUCCjzftGUNhM9yuP7qLHIo0BwHC+gjzrQG6J OEKkL9fPFpurBQxP3e2h9lZsB4TD1FL9LEMRFi+4ZbHzng8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYyweFCzdSoEBdCLhn0FqY6j41nbXETIUB0DBZTm4Mnxo94hRmvfzSS4T5RuGFQSvLzJJI8Q6b17C9xc7DEYA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:958e:: with SMTP id r14mr2272762ejx.319.1609924058655; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 01:07:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:6848:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 01:07:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0FAE354A-A6ED-428E-A9E2-E7D439E04499@stanleylieber.com> References: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> <0FAE354A-A6ED-428E-A9E2-E7D439E04499@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:07:38 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: high-performance firewall SQL over AJAX persistence map/reduce rails Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk well it's all new to me, too. dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com this line, seems to suggest that gmail.com has to go into quarantine because of a dmarc subdomain policy. but no gmail subdomain is used so it shouldn't apply. it feels like your mail server is incorrectly looking at sp=. On 1/6/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: > On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be >>complaining about gmail... >> >>On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part: >>>> >>>>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >>>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>>>header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >>>> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>>>designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>>>smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >>>> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com >>>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; Tue >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >>>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >>>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM). >>>> >>>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >>>>> quarantine decision: >>>>> >>>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >>>>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>>>> header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >>>>> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>>>> designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>>>> smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >>>>> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) >>>>> header.from=gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine should >>>>> not >>>>> apply >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: Jonas Amoson >>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >>>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) >>>>> To: 9front@9front.org >>>>> >>>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load >>>>> all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a >>>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes >>>>> the loading slow. >>>>> >>>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >>>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe >>>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec). >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front >>>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load, >>>>> that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either. >>>>> >>>>> /Jonas >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today. hopefully >>> gmail >>> will stop complaining once it propagates. >>> >>> sl >>> >> > > you'll have to walk me through that. all i see is google demanding to see > our papers. > > sl >