From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31882 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2021 10:08:23 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Apr 2021 10:08:23 -0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]) by 1ess; Fri Apr 16 05:58:26 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r13so9913834pjf.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NPFyuWfmWrC7ifqe6IlgqeuBV9qs8klmn4A0Suf3ljc=; b=B6hpm/Q//G9P8IuAOM4r9ukwubsI58xfO3C5JDpJ9X0+SORGloJP9pGjvv/5VSR5SV SyYXnnzGy0XrAyOe97bjvjxlG68GvaNver8ZY1s5TK5c1lKE2cR9IW72gfkSxfjUFyU7 g74E2m+ySGYIPXrXpZ/T83zT6drG8P51SUOk8rrQsqA1bmqnwz7LmySoyP/mZsl2dTZh mcrOMgnCINFLOKQ9I6uKK7IxuQpPtHMKR07fZkGh59gEi3Fc9VG6hewYlhsgYka8LQem PW66RmlUkTWDwlHdmxpA+nzrqwqk5lrHWu3zK/JKH3d+AWuuRROnkYNhz+5MMLHO+5RN YMZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NPFyuWfmWrC7ifqe6IlgqeuBV9qs8klmn4A0Suf3ljc=; b=AEKGrbtyEz9R/kPhkC/TO8cngNdYfzQKa9ylS62D7tUdDZZqYOp1yTxMNkZV0coGV7 WeQCcrqWBjgpOEoK0EcEiVjw8lHvdIY4ryc/I0LZ6khyOA6j7wh+GAIWBH0LkL0DPuG9 oZWOZs3r+nWrDe2Rbp9bOAQtfDjf41Uzfz+knFYODsjeaYc2Ik2za2UIwIRBVkGizi+R xoeIU5iNtRGy6XU0ngfjg+QxrRBTbpy77cB1UJydD4rj6UWkuB3tjNQxvZgtN1y/p1OT nAYnv/nKBJObvVUederlLZho4WjINHxveriVjF582OG/yL/WaFgm6nLc6HllcHuSJZw9 Xwpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334FBuKbih8CH9N7i1DJWgiIaGsMWccZZ3uDRiXEjz+UNMwDz8t ziZ/e8SW5H2+4kAGhL14Jaqka2qaORzyfBT1O0PI1lrxuso= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEDlveauljrrWdd1uyf23l7dXFnjUvijUjlfq9K+yxqVBoXTFanzQY2HOly29g+WAnpVZH0Hh//bn6dkY47TQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4c2:b029:ea:deb1:dfd5 with SMTP id o2-20020a170902d4c2b02900eadeb1dfd5mr8579652plg.79.1618565113847; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:25:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a01e:b029:1b:3549:26b7 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:25:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:25:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: advanced immutable extension STM controller Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] aux/wacom: prevent "no concurrent reads please" error when moving the pen too fast and support screen tilt Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk yeah, i was wondering if that was the motivation here, esp. in regards to minimizing user perceived latency. and if yes i'd be curious if it's actually significant enough to matter. i can imagine high throughput scenarios, just not mouse input, where this seems safe to assume even without measuring :D On 4/15/21, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: >> maybe we need to implement pid reusal... > > already done. wrapping pid's should not be a problem. > > the main concern is that creating and destroying processes > has a cost compared to just wake up a existing process. > > -- > cinap >