From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 6452 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2021 20:24:15 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Aug 2021 20:24:15 -0000
Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]) by 1ess; Sun Aug 15 02:47:53 -0400 2021
Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d17so17116035plr.12
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 23:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=oLItTQZ1L2kQr3+72l9v5J5Sw+zGBpmxeCKx2sQrbhY=;
        b=Hmj4UaPDXO4xQnlJrNXFzCuRMZKRVvrgzd02hA0t9UhXBp/xnJm8efUIxIDQqLO4Ic
         cZGvRWryWn4i7UYjNyFRbzZPoiKV+xLGB1JA1V5i+S76ECBF9a+6hMM6wzPnd/IrWgMB
         xBbSbA3rEWNq9Q+QYJA5HfYFUUfVS75zdUH+y/DYw4hFycygCLZ8rSz/MVsKgeL7AgPJ
         jgc8DWr0vAOGvxBL1nV1Ebb39J50WmMWgiaJc8Ox6OQSsuMLHw1Ru6qOHsswk0/ycray
         RR4o14UUTZswCVLdSpozqOjK6QiLDVNUQbeoE3e9osAI0uywgPYNnBuyTqgpamCXdO0I
         yN9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=oLItTQZ1L2kQr3+72l9v5J5Sw+zGBpmxeCKx2sQrbhY=;
        b=C8848D7jCGw9rWYs34j/1j4SklSWZl08xkoQocq2FjfBcW+kkX/eauroT7moTaRNFZ
         zGXtDRt8ra5tydr1WNoEBTTGAvDyK3ntFdNy2/b6NFwwsrb2/aSww9AWkG9mQRBfMu/m
         eLX4JAjwynilOoREX6MQL380xPyXvlA90qtT3kZRDcbgCN/IpYOkuXkOhKup3/X7BWIG
         dT7iMiZNUQ8Td8FcRCJ7w2CblLOSCY4VJyPsmiAeUbHKPN9v4MBIG9Ab4rp5neO7MpeP
         wr7b9MqA1SUDxB1X8E5X14AXObSnWJcB0j8HtzBhcR0Cw4tG0+KVyiv/XjydWLntMwbH
         Amwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DVkmc5OgK9mi7UfvTqM5zfF60ZzlcqTJHrPhEppB9O2Qs3JFo
	M1CI5DFM6Ph0MwySr+i+pUjenkMZbUko/zpKJvWTkPHB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfpH7Hvusg67ipO2YjgdqAP6yYVsutB0luU7z5QlnKm2Hj8CUNFFvDuKJ7Mw1+IpDosWepk4Rpan48h3FxKGk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4498:: with SMTP id t24mr10569163pjg.235.1629010064542;
 Sat, 14 Aug 2021 23:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3210:b029:36:6c8c:f6d1 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2021
 23:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <35D30064F0C69F74F6CF5AF1C2CAC860@smtp.pobox.com>
References: <CAFSF3XOvjw=EKx-Wj_NNYdXDGKtogwnMHNsVPAvirsXrUFTLPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <35D30064F0C69F74F6CF5AF1C2CAC860@smtp.pobox.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:47:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XOUL6QPyW_MrpK6HE3PjxRniH9qfzYjj8O5sEtB-VN8mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: extended responsive callback blockchain WEB2.0 component DOM framework 
Subject: Re: [9front] PATCH: click-to-focus in fgui
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/14/21, unobe@cpan.org <unobe@cpan.org> wrote:
> Quoth hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>:
>> > So far you're free to treat that as whatever you want. As you seem to
>> > hate the discussion and maybe the participants of it
>>
>> thanks for making it easy for me so I know i can stop reading already
>> after the second sentence.
>> both statements are untrue.
>
> I'm not understanding your line of reasoning, hiro: his first
> statement is untrue?  You (hiro) are not free to treat that (i.e., his
> previous e-mail's content) as whatever you want (e.g., some sort of
> trolling)?
>
> For the second sentence, you only quoted the premise: Eckard said you
> "seem"--it's his perspective.  If his perspective is not true, that's
> not the same as his statement re: his perspective not being true.[1]
> You can just say that his perspective (i.e, "hiro hate[s] the
> discussion and maybe the participants of it") isn't true, or just
> ignore the first paragraph entirely.  If the premise is untrue, then
> his conclusion ("it's probably of much more value if you sit down and
> write a Plan9 bible with all se do's and dont's well ordered by
> precedence") does not necessarily follow.  After the first paragraph,
> the rest of his e-mail is mainly focused on the issue.  He is open to
> discussion.  He ends his e-mail with: "Up to now, I didn't find a
> strong counterargument against a different focus policy, but am still
> open to know that."
>
> [1] The difference between "She seems to be angry" and she actually
> being angry.
>
>

wrong.
disclaimer: i'm not an expert in hiro studies.