From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 6270 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2021 01:20:43 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Jan 2021 01:20:43 -0000
Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]) by 1ess; Sun Jan 10 19:50:19 -0500 2021
Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ga15so22408766ejb.4
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:50:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=A448K8CeHofzbOYLkVrp/bfgANMB3kzdMh/+cko4x3k=;
        b=drK6Mg2jqVAYmRut+NccCxqsvrr4qvszbjvuP652KV48KyYLsnM1xQXBhUDdVOQpD+
         IwOCtQomcaHWXhoQnVfaQP2yzKsD9EdKxmcdIuP1PjD8QThk9yde1qeiVYa9DQINUgnC
         cZ7dg+I7HkhJV1q2dFf7jRVm4GDypUQzPzfDrnlFne6lZdSap6uPLf0MT3gOKKFNgxdn
         fcUuzGOTUM20Io+qm+0EBSl0ForlK+9FWF1M+RGQExzVYwToaWffgMnzMBRkdkSR5uhD
         kkCMb67FupZfE4U9gr+rsKYcaxWx/pMghtKTG+g3qYZR+9BReMohxV77JmNiag40irPm
         1HYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=A448K8CeHofzbOYLkVrp/bfgANMB3kzdMh/+cko4x3k=;
        b=EnIjks42bj58mhQhD1ZjVMW81x1M6TNKFFSvMgoGEAzFVT7ORGK2damZ2WFQqfSA2c
         i9tyG8Hoq8vHhSFSLCF2Vq/MLC0nPrje3FAI9JSvct4n4rfuH7uvyQeVxkrZDFOhv72p
         pCGyJrYDb5kvWmKPaphUlUSUxLuknX9M01BCLE28JjIybUfMTxz98FTOxs2sZu9zCZc6
         cC3+xVEMqILapauyB/smliZHolw+opjRBwqDwasfxg0Ejj2XvO6sQ4uLwVHjifpwlqeL
         /D3JdtIoaa6i8rfPE2AHx1TwbOxsgtecW3CcwgRjql0OOy/3bj48sAQbaLB/KirBKXCf
         pHEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312fNx+l+lpobenlQKR2fFqtWCnTak7jM+HGVdD4IUp/1WNWmyT
	q64YZFwhDJTA3mOtPPnfSyuUl0m4hl7nNRgbst3tI2NO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpHbL10TFAUMMTBj+mKCG+Ix/bubCahdkpfazahV1veBblnt7BbMBWchOHcrKnboUlDGrLKO7ga5/iipOsoyM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d8d:: with SMTP id s13mr9188978eju.305.1610326208330;
 Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:50:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:906:6848:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:50:07
 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f651af301ed16bed@orthanc.ca>
References: <5D539F3B5C5BE2EC03CA37F0E865840A@eigenstate.org> <f651af301ed16bed@orthanc.ca>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 01:50:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XObMiSQtHQ7RX1Yos3YxoQFmsa5vpDEnMPj6vjDGSgV9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: flexible compliant strategy NoSQL realtime-java GPU framework 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] webfs: add 'headers' file
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

i agree with lyndon, having two similar interfaces is even worse than
having none.
esp. for unimportant stuff like webfs, http servers will be much less
stable than webfs anyway.

On 1/10/21, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> ori@eigenstate.org writes:
>
>> We don't need to -- but how many scripts and programs are we
>> willing to break, and how badly?
>
> Well ... fixing things in the base is easy enough.  For the others,
> bind(1) is a viable workaround until they get updated.
>
> I don't like breaking things gratuitously, but I'll do it if it
> means a cleaner/more consistent interface.
>
> All just IMO of course.
>
> --lyndon
>