From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13380 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2023 08:40:40 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Oct 2023 08:40:40 -0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]) by 9front; Wed Oct 4 04:35:15 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2791d5f1a09so437847a91.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 01:35:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696408512; x=1697013312; darn=9front.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kYS3+9ezNlULC+zOKUwzxy+FFaQoTFJyeLte1QV/iVQ=; b=WrzTBS81kQbdWwBXGzlrQnHmv3EDYyZstfObOIAqcp5D96bEeYiMiLzEXyr7d5H1Dc uC/36mW2sq9B1YIC0JPKE26nXtrpddRebEaKll0oEDlSBUjhb4Ov6I9iB8oaU7ZHDxnz b0kWYUJn3kc8h5iObpkskZlKGPDSmxVpZ4s3LmB3BQuGeQHvqE6g/gdSSjdUreq32rJV yIxQUfWshyMAdtWnuw8LqSdSs421MJLN0qpx9PeLPMSgatrNdIeCCZiZ3mVLw0e81mMK pbtNR4fNYfUW9SwVOgWsUlOzTc4fH+CKEU/7hBPA2vMvDKlKole8oMgpreiBexMfuDuc J6/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696408512; x=1697013312; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kYS3+9ezNlULC+zOKUwzxy+FFaQoTFJyeLte1QV/iVQ=; b=KTOssq5z0m37PfccO+wrYGTcvqboiEAficyk0LaX8svdtk9EyQ5PpWk3R95DBYRs5A uI6+VHGmJQ2+e6Z5Z+lkgkZsCRXigc2ddz0QmCWhr07cDFxmD+jhWl1R4HDDcva9e/Jp CcK1gLgekEyemHxl3+b9huMx0gqGtvMdU0k5Kn5jfjMwbdW6qul0t4DtT4jT74XrKYcn 707vn2Go4LQXf+K0QoJtfIort9Pkk5+1rZxQky3mbUZUP6wX+6PZwwumPZ/qa1icTh6c 6OZAOiUb+I33QyXIfnV2UBPMpXCpYBcCiWjPFMNsda86I1UxO0w+QKfjfWDIwp8W0Xkc JNKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy2SDnavx8lIfXTRVHZEe9pZLz0on1LImUPKDsd5RjMzUWL1mFo u2IvmprBiQPtILWvXnJHvETrOW66HUwLNQnkNnH+VOQ6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEq0tJI8Ms+LmJse7+S2xCNo5Y74DX7sLnyomiz5fB31IYIshAQgysZVIrMGF2ziUGuRW8pgQFHed31mi1PgNw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:13cb:b0:26d:1f75:7fa3 with SMTP id s11-20020a17090a13cb00b0026d1f757fa3mr1406838pjf.4.1696408511938; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 01:35:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:7300:5403:b0:b9:cf17:60ea with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 01:35:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <34F7A5E47A938C760E0970ED1E8FC757@smtp.pobox.com> References: <051BE365BDD4F4BC4AF19C6300D44B62@eigenstate.org> <34F7A5E47A938C760E0970ED1E8FC757@smtp.pobox.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:35:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: replication proxy hosting Subject: Re: [9front] DNS/ICMP via sshnet(4) or drawterm Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk i think the udp stuff should work, debug it again? i managed to tftp-boot a machine to 9front over drawterm once. i guess the icmp is missing in drawterm, but it's possible to add that. it's not very complicated to forward it in the same way as UDP. the hardest part is finding the right interfaces on each of the drawterm host platforms (win32, unix, etc) On 10/4/23, unobe@cpan.org wrote: > Quoth ori@eigenstate.org: >> > My other major use case is ping. I see that there is such a thing as >> > ping-over-tcp. I suppose one of the use cases for providing >> > ping-over-tcp is seeing if packet-shaping is having an impact on a >> > connection. That would suggest to me that ip/ping would be modified, >> > or just a separate utility. >> > >> >> I don't think ICMP forwarding is worth the effort; >> it's ok to just not have it. > > Right, I wasn't thinking of ICMP forwarding proper, but from what I > read online it's sending an ACK or SYN packet and measure the respones > time. Maybe there's something that already does that, or it's trivial > to do. > > Anyway, thanks again for the reply re: DNS-overTCP. > >