From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10086 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2020 19:50:26 -0000 Received: from ewsd.inri.net (107.191.116.128) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Dec 2020 19:50:26 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]) by ewsd; Sun Dec 20 14:49:38 -0500 2020 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ce23so10595866ejb.8 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:49:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9rn6ltV+bjc9CVCCz4ywHqEnA5eLt76QHni9F/VQlUA=; b=mz4Bm8tscF9KUNGdhbz7VAFrniL2a+XXx9sTrJas2/STMrpi8BDFMAaxrWBV/jPG+N zSzn0gghWjKkWgVoiI751SmlsbTkXV4dhwRoF7Oi83UYDCQ9elmneFqReZQkmYgJ/gZU ZfSTGotEF1NSmNuhJ3L3nIvrN955Qzlj5ezRbigeQM+aInXHkGOhrwUctoq6c0hz63Zw pFvPX5O6rvu1owqFbV3OQXm/FxholRK5K1F9iPjCCBVU7WX+y9KtKThnJTs5LvB8Qc4e 1eQrwhu/ZQoJ1K8RL/szd8UDjyByDu4Ig1pzHVpZUgAQu4gITPxfsSzG3VuVf0d84Vth XKaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9rn6ltV+bjc9CVCCz4ywHqEnA5eLt76QHni9F/VQlUA=; b=EzG/1E28yM1257s1b9PlZcEpFMh0q/aKieVEMtluKQcXiQh/XkxAJrgeXlTaSpL+4S f5BoKgHq9jdQ8kRprzFRhDzHQtu9LPrRwkD1bpzW9cBJ1NkkI5IltcHWYmCApZBWxCQt KCjrPkVB21HKJHgVmrrOaW9/Bs3idz+8Z2ISCP/LQUPtdW8n8XXmpnQbwPkp0H+YwJK8 TRmAsGvbPKnbtKU3MKoKyZLtxcgPH9ojC9vkTxzmnAlXXpH4D20P83DDC+cZX8/0ZLku epdn3pBYou/3tYoHDKqDW+8n3Ou1E8wlSUU395zMkXVUioheG0L/PM+jw5U5d2JNGKY3 rQPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YlWm7RI70GKRGntvC9KbZTFfHeikzNbR9qVdztGWOQLvJ+t7Z bXzSSK1LnkU95s7m/oAimpWLE7uI+UWOaPCZpgCmntMzJBk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzNQzhEyQB7CZdu6bk+hEsNOOWpGd1CTPlSIzYpHV6LfUGqELP6ctB50gSSysOlEP4t7rA0Phq6gnSTdX+GY8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:259a:: with SMTP id m26mr12883322ejb.399.1608493768657; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:6848:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2B00BA68FFBEF791E1A7F8173F3F4257@eigenstate.org> References: <2B00BA68FFBEF791E1A7F8173F3F4257@eigenstate.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:49:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: encrypted social interface engine hosting map/reduce layer Subject: Re: [9front] RFNOMNT vs unmount Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 12/20/20, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > When trying to restrict a program, it seems common to > bind /path/to/resource over /, and then calling > 'rfork m'. really? i have never seen this on plan9. instead it seems like something you would do on linux (with chroot).