From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8888 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 23:28:36 -0000 Received: from mars2.inri.net (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 23:28:36 -0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 5 17:52:38 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id y24so2536963edt.10 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:49:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FrHqb0mG9I8CR7mFPL6PBiEjCzhU/wquS7taWeG2zfM=; b=gY9zeXCdLWpx8SAKg69r5JUrDgpTTkwF5b2zmnSJ4J3PrnmAq1TV4tTQbYSqTlFbWi hbUTgqdJEvW8auZpfQ3dARYWBa08CQLymfQW4LtqqKXYyBS7bQIzn1wr1MEgUiva8J7J ZmEJKIyr8W5ggvToASxKuPehtelxq8Oc6ijBQ1Lp5ywZUprGP68lQqCQJRQrGsT6jbJ3 ggn8I1qy0VTEi0ZFce1ZuxqiSrvmjnWwXL4BZj3BD89udk+PiR1+/LcEripVS3SI0sJd Eu/oWBjqRQB6fSLexX2PHIB68GQo6AHJ5dRu/YguQKtJpWb5oVusCCxJJR8K14VEIuHP rs+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=FrHqb0mG9I8CR7mFPL6PBiEjCzhU/wquS7taWeG2zfM=; b=uDAOY+ovO3dSzWzLnT8/UeEoyyDowrtUd/EFkmh9q6/8QK6xK6++I9BWes6KR0MLpS UExHt4n15YX8Oi33eYQz8O/DHCy0ieBSTkSff3urAP3u7aJQS5KMbvHY5xQ0YuOom+Uf LYN4TFy3bt9BCCJDi2c5HS9wPWqslHxVEaBxR+hYG2jELopQYF2khoBk96SqwY8r+wca nXRly7Yu0D4bWOL2IUQfoJ6evV2mf/ZvfV8puxFAd95zkr18EiV1mncpKQ28t2AfeP5U LvLN7I0wSUpkMYW4jE5uAAyUA1zOqGWK9eUrtAO8gZaE3QGQGI0tnl41wEjtnIcGfbpf XVLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530D7VEuBQlrozwlJT74pjdHRn2vk5M9IQYzTsG6UgfyNRgk/0SG O53rZ8EifVwuaThwa+m2psqCxVjY8v9rq+CogUUUfRQ0mzw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXFheyhV2pEbaseM9//HGZWHhuOiTBoq8vAuQan1XCYG0hhlAg+jAzQTyoEoGJKIT9onPdFKiWQga2tmy9boo= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c94a:: with SMTP id h10mr1903519edt.247.1609886345783; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:6848:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> References: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: advanced CSS DOM rails plugin-oriented manager Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be complaining about gmail... On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: > On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>i did not manage to quote the relevant part: >> >>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com >>Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; Tue >> Jan >> >>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >>by manually pressing NOT SPAM). >> >>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >>> quarantine decision: >>> >>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com >>> header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW; >>> spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net >>> designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender) >>> smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net; >>> dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com >>> >>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine should >>> not >>> apply >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Jonas Amoson >>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) >>> To: 9front@9front.org >>> >>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load >>> all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a >>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes >>> the loading slow. >>> >>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe >>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec). >>> >>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front >>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load, >>> that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either. >>> >>> /Jonas >>> >> > > i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today. hopefully gmail > will stop complaining once it propagates. > > sl >