From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15236 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2022 21:42:57 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Sep 2022 21:42:57 -0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f43.google.com ([209.85.217.43]) by 9front; Tue Sep 27 17:40:38 -0400 2022 Received: by mail-vs1-f43.google.com with SMTP id j123so2598068vsc.3 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=xDtUNXxNL9Bcc5dvX5p0qqz55wSTKC07XeV2sU2i9aw=; b=Q/tMbXBNI9GyXVAxULLOy11wywXhCkG3+uPwyaL7FP6lCUqafmhrWGD8n+Mmfrh172 ygGj+PiHgzzuDTXFqWQ7/uBTuYtS44+Dkq78zb/cNfVUS+xTRpUKUXtBjS9yKAR2uE9A gxEQ3J5bd1EgkLAMCtuUtBVlq/eKyf8avIPv/e89CAkxUlqShtfXZ4ZlyqtSvraFgPtA LCuKpCRY4A5v6ALjEU0dx7alngixmsw6H69d+E/iSH5/Bm9icz9QIpMUg9UDPEWx/zka OjSNVDlP7w0RQSnhKP2nLI239RLELzelVpVN2kmby9VdkSyg6Z/0qszaEd/L75IXbjjH CHUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=xDtUNXxNL9Bcc5dvX5p0qqz55wSTKC07XeV2sU2i9aw=; b=kyYUs+0rtMOcq0TOf8OlfnQhLB714DuibgrBdB0uGO22HFVZfwDP+Qhu/qtkMal5Qt PJLm9HonAzOwsxeSF5IJAld6bQf4c2nE/EgtW+5Kh1ZpFXOHFecWtgZZB3XeYXcbcNVN xCAUeg/9ITNTWA5BTeTJ9BYuphCh538wUauNZZFkdhEQcRZKfO5wy6y+yRVmWPWrkESP qwerbh2m/Vk7dztvR2i1JwWkKeDMdP8GR+0uiJejcaorBaBQnx6lTFRD0fJz0V33ul3V uUp0O4ezyx6CsH/NB4yf9Qhz1NCnL+30nX/pydMcbloLLhMOH/vKEOHoIv+O0yN/Sr2t CpLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0qa6jMzClqDnrOIrvPXQ/ACvBzrp1tcZ2qXn4teW8aXFO3na/G OejJTLo4XhQFk64zAD5nOPyiq94P5WOjaESubek/NphGScA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5rcPMnrhDSHutgZKS2UmhB1ERkDshh5y0WDqDSZgKyrycnCT/6Ibi0L++JuFGyUXlzMgbQDnxynagMqQvtIZM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7283:0:b0:398:b38b:6884 with SMTP id n125-20020a677283000000b00398b38b6884mr12871734vsc.66.1664314834524; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:40:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:3812:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:40:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3DMSK5YMQX9O5.3QDWBNMBRGWP7@mforney.org> References: <8DCF165E26E87FA681256EFA7DDFDE8E@eigenstate.org> <3SV1D3BDX9GTI.2KFKQ4XBWIE2D@mforney.org> <3DMSK5YMQX9O5.3QDWBNMBRGWP7@mforney.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:40:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: module reduce/map firewall Subject: Re: [9front] obsolete cryptographic algorithms Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk DSA might be useful to somebody to interoperate with some very old non-plan9 software. this is not suckless where stuff gets deleted just so the LOC count looks pretty. as long as nothing uses the DSA code, and as long as nobody has to waste much time maintaining it there's no cost. On 9/27/22, Michael Forney wrote: > hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> this has been discussed often enough. there might be non-plan9 >> software that still uses dsa. > > It seems unlikely that non-plan9 software would be using plan9 > libsec. > > But maybe I'm misunderstanding you. Can you clarify or provide an > example? >