From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]) by ewsd; Sat Jan 18 03:19:55 EST 2020
Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id d73so9565093wmd.1
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:19:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=uFNNBrre4qtgQBSxBQS7WPTm2WdklsypNYM6RGKocmw=;
        b=PpaIG4Z/N5D38CQ/Rw3CJsHCgM37Tybd0zPlISeQiqtlk9onntsLmg7PEz/1DtDQdP
         RRkiNR6iriVB/oGO4fGq8SJFLWr1x9vWR+GDgAMrrC5cunLWdpXTD7KCM7G0LiUvvqPP
         uaRj8YMy1h+2mHNJ0vBGNJSxi3KMYA7SmCzAatLKqAzJlta0ZbZNt4U5l8gy02iOWrEc
         dpDl/9SMUqUATu7ETfBjttG0H5pJEBA/GKNEkAnd8iqlTh4HdwmHHi4HnA7lRi9rkKO+
         ZYUSXxFZ8gB2YX6c87KitiJPjw44D0pkyMWwqGipoWSnT8bYlC7EcdzjaXR271k/tJRy
         qAFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=uFNNBrre4qtgQBSxBQS7WPTm2WdklsypNYM6RGKocmw=;
        b=tCkOwPiQYf6cYHJ/5pSKnJWpE334vHuzTrSqS+1gPePsHVw1Q1Rxwzn14RCSqDEaMU
         PGkVoSQqQOqGQYOrN08X9ZXdo+rL6l7J4iQIKY3t9T9pLmGR2x4hJxZDAnpt9TjJ4eHu
         JKX4YgBIQi9Jw15lHgKJLwYQ80Zjjbo84HPHnBJECw7QbOHK311lw8O6qR5KFJhMnXpC
         BDIDXzE9KcJ++Skj5qdCNZGaCqaYaFN5p9+wp31LRBK/bv1bZSg+IdH3AZrPor2Vk/w2
         mYRVfdxDoywUep/e5zW6/zRSrjZ7RFrbZjW+I47lxEHU24jxO1U7GE/2EKXsrICjNX2J
         ZIvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSinmbjml6TD+ZdznUX3XOH9bUziU3pxVVxsS4WqTqC2caqtC3
	KjFUL+kZ6GKaDzJ6P06UTdfi5GfcHn9PlaRzOn1yj5oF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxVztf9o0vDUPrbhiR+sdBfhxzlzt+N5PMTiB2gJRHHwFESoWtV6c0/IrRiyOMewQKHgV7nUqZeB2KtnC5OUpo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:411:: with SMTP id q17mr8674406wmb.180.1579335590887;
 Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:19:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6000:108f:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:19:49
 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XNfdhb+ViOBmVMQ+5+PnSjCeD+9a9p9e4Ug0EX9==aZvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5c2e3e1c-99a4-4caf-9ab4-615035aec1f8@www.fastmail.com>
 <EFC0BF3379A3C032D5568E0E5CB5D3A1@a-b.xyz> <CAHjwAuz4a-+om6cXazWhQnVLHjCuh5rY73zN2Y0SsStgHojZgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <f4e58d5cca0ecd34@orthanc.ca> <CD223422-594E-4D80-87CB-8787DCB32C46@stanleylieber.com>
 <CAFSF3XNfdhb+ViOBmVMQ+5+PnSjCeD+9a9p9e4Ug0EX9==aZvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 08:19:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XPHOhVuSgyv2MtCbaP_4DV3KDRZ+xB0K+LbYrXE1CVBag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9front] rio wishlists
To: "9front@9front.org" <9front@9front.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: deep-learning callback frontend 

 i like the idea of having only one layer of namespace separation in rio, i.e.
windows inside a subrio could all just share the same parent ns. would be
useful for me not to have to post every window's ns ressources in a
/srv. and the top-level rio would still allow separation (and by
default).
not sure i need a window manager for that :)

the main problem is that right now rio terminals have their own ns so
that they can have their own /dev/* files per window, bound there for
them by rio.
but there should be a way to allow partial sharing of namespaces, i.e.
all other files.