From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15960 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2021 12:25:09 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Mar 2021 12:25:09 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]) by 1ess; Fri Mar 26 07:46:07 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id l4so7917169ejc.10 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 04:45:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M/PWQmY4xIJQL1Xeurbz8iqOhjEeiXBiDms/+08vN8A=; b=XsnjML9tYMPArAYw2ZqfOOvHzTjq0TdRM7W6p5zXwyStmvYXh4SEj4DniG0T04DJnQ x6CJLH/Ia8XA63O6tH13CfBptZTGQa7tAKF+avD4zq9s5hmYBWjc5nWCkjcHZyha6LQC M4fpEkj2ow8emUqrXjCnpdwM1sw0LSdq3GCeIX4/4VAo+EltaSZ9qd79qQQrKAcVqtt5 +6ak4dbY0WcwlSD+ZiQt/dU06e15YLZuFWwJZtFmKrVvXtH5nzFVrkFWmXC6CPJXMOx7 ZdhNEzKDASbKxDQeRItzOIVV+tUJu6N7HOFf+RMa7B3dhtvpZPjsFizMgL3Ok7k7Y9jK aXfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=M/PWQmY4xIJQL1Xeurbz8iqOhjEeiXBiDms/+08vN8A=; b=IURJvsB3HHk0oFw7Joex0i/6X88ktagYhTzCgpvchgCyW+fB8O1y58dJeuBdhfm5sO OJgE2ahGqIcmBypAAsH3Jry7LJSaSxQqjupb7dSZcWTCc+rwzelXcaUGCkd4orljJ4le TmfY8SPeofLIsd4xkx8wLVbc3XAulnODBVLRPrQjgjwQKtcIlCt/x/wBX46pN4WFm6n4 aUyqniqqnrizw8eDSG6ibROVX3nga0WIV17uTnZAJbPFu18kpTFvdIkjAU7M3DVBYKVm aaf/IOPTBm0SMTAvpJ/O3iSRwFTL1KLb+l+OFJ7JpVVYOUGI8C/ek6W933/JJrH19w+j u5Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318plo0fbqI7l0hUuknPtAOio4G/QJuBKCar7nL+/n/9Ti4RsHE h67M3/mq/2Jrb8Ft98T3nyYpcdAaZTp49+CEihv7Pgn50Yg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLXXb1z8rgXupWaWMBLJn88mIKGOMfAsKmTki2jIIc7N6mau23HoCFtjXlM+rvnY8fj6YIlathlDsz6g9Ktd8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2062:: with SMTP id qp2mr14740749ejb.397.1616759157051; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 04:45:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:4486:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 04:45:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <08B2BC7C-F72C-453C-AA68-A80D21A66A06@quintile.net> References: <08B2BC7C-F72C-453C-AA68-A80D21A66A06@quintile.net> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:45:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized out-scaling-aware interface Subject: Re: [9front] fossil? Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk mycroftiv has fixes for fossil/venti that also work on 9front, it's just that nobody has stepped up to provide this in mainline 9front or support it (and accept the responsibility). i prefer this over dumping it in and then generating all kinds of bug reports from users. even having 2 default filesystems is one too many IMO and adding a third option just makes it worse. having more options is not always better, especially not with something so centrally important as your central file server. On 3/26/21, Steve Simon wrote: > > I have run fossil 24x7 since 2004, > i can attest to it being solid and reliable. > > there was a bug in the snapshot code (not dumps but ephemeral snapshots) but > this was fixed years ago. > > there is an issue where it can fail badly if the file system fills up - but > this has never happened to me as i run fossil with venti. > > i would say fossil+venti is can be slow, but large ram caches help > considerably. > > i have never tried hjfs or cwfs, i can only say i am happy with fossil and > venti. > > -Steve > > >