From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19941 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2021 12:30:35 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Jul 2021 12:30:35 -0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]) by 1ess; Tue Jul 13 17:33:03 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id n11so12859079pjo.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+jVEJXa3QE6nsEnvpX8IZRbmTyfVt5aKejsm5T5Slc=; b=nLHJgXS4M5XaiNJVLwCTesuBCXBf09GvZVgmq20mnKHUHrrAgXKl2eyNmhApN8O/wm PsYGiz+ent7RT/WoBtML6DG1S/t1owbP8F8qu80zGypYhkg49sx40wxJKiiDQ3iWI14V fLDelpbrAy66DKreFCi38I/L1KnO0cSg6afx/o0RwMypXflTLW8tMGthap/ARZVcnM22 x8sAL8CXDvp0hiSYxUDRPvm4MGH1Hlya254j5k9+Ag9Ks1Rq0XqZBBwNpF+mTpNMs5Ww V8/5FIDIT75ahvm/IysMbTdzF4uKD/Qos4ga5K4AXDiuCucGbHw0WIr9gUW9PoPg4R0J W+VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+jVEJXa3QE6nsEnvpX8IZRbmTyfVt5aKejsm5T5Slc=; b=kivq5G4PB4q+sThKiZfheJKxy+lkQuu6l9o/g/EaBMnORFMeBK7/wdK9S3v6EM7vEt 3jevdN5eyyEqmHbohP1kfO+/zxGevfhJHa1MixrkzR2LsJIf/syB2s0+vXKmtV6QuAwS 4HhlnWI6/NcouaiCsOB3rnRz2cn5vgdnRJQLDHHHeM+5HZxPuUYuMMwplYsOmBCHVg4x YQp+Ck+089qDpOrRwJdpxnyFEFDDAGKMF+iNf2Lb9iGNCOBAJwi03JoM9wS8d7looOdm iYIjTSehOzDdyzW4MoTIlyL7QoIERb57U+LwYR3iPxBdzqHYTWvvwwAuCXAvKCPLy4tE SCIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326feLGukqCbRiDvGxg+NuqKZGHH5uj79NF+gK//zlVCrzHJX1Z fRRMNFxRdFNnT7n8ysLGT1d8qjfKFbAxqZW22+ZsWiJf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo8MNyvz8sJ6hp2Lw59qS3dlCYxcUTD8V9CPk6r90zMyulzwVFk0hE7yc2aQ8F+rv3er8js4Z8EfYbKMY5uB8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4498:: with SMTP id t24mr462825pjg.235.1626211976455; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a002:b029:1e:dcb9:6f96 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8CE29EA89CBA8F74C1D4D8EEF2528473@eigenstate.org> <31017285-5870-4BF4-96E5-EDC5E307F6FF@gmail.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:32:55 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: just-in-time session control Subject: Re: [9front] Mouse clipping patch Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk just ignore empty rios. only non-rio clients would be supported. or is there a reason why one might want to constrain somebody's mouse to a rio ?! On 7/13/21, Jos=C3=A9 Miguel S=C3=A1nchez Garc=C3=ADa = wrote: > That's actually true, if I want that key to both unfocus a window and > unfocus rio if there is no focused window. It would require special > treatment for rio windows... Back to the drawing board... > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:47 PM Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: >> >> >> > On Jul 13, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Jos=C3=A9 Miguel S=C3=A1nchez Garc=C3=AD= a >> > wrote: >> > >> > Innermost-focused rio gets the control, with a key for "giving up" the >> > focus (going then a "level" up in the stack) is what i propose. >> >> Now you are breaking the fourth wall and making rio aware that there >> may (or may not?) be another world outside it. By default rio >> passes input down to its children, after breaking this fourth wall, >> rio has to process the input somehow and determine if it wants to >> "give up" the focus to its parent. What if its child that has the >> focus is a rio? How does it know how many of its descendent rios >> have "given up"? >