From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-yb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]) by ewsd; Thu Apr  5 17:37:29 EDT 2018
Received: by mail-yb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e3-v6so11834006ybk.1
        for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=MeOW6DORSR+sxumC6o615nr7+GI7bCke7O501FkEsl4=;
        b=o+Fzzs0jTED8L6AWYDGJsq8q8uAI0+N6A78MzfAwjuPJDGLzwejiF6rPMGdYKQTQKJ
         /Ghd4oCO2oV+xIGTMmFQUqAVUeo2+nZJtmuvLRUp9Z0yh9zYMQSnNYlps44Ned5pl8Ki
         eRnUJiaBMM2pbwETqNB7Zi9emPg3RctSicqSCxed9ktrqR2gmxS9UiCuCmQEfl37AES7
         ZUGL43i8Fd/95pfiUberDqPQrIrNC0BuxBVObRtzE0yEVoeXF1RUpB7oBnh6MdTqPCMr
         rLRM0TahgxdACTAO2Uzj1/aXIHcV5C61LxQ9hRC8R/ofX5pPLBDZ1unlpM7FSZJGkJvH
         Me6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=MeOW6DORSR+sxumC6o615nr7+GI7bCke7O501FkEsl4=;
        b=tFg1u+WgvBCszJhhkZTTd8Q1VrxlI0WYQcHzgRCZ1AgDYruz11droeVdWuHB4VkMvd
         WorKPG4jVKTvisyHQlrwSa0CSXwm1QREW/czDC1Fuy25ozzw6DSSZyrp35zhBoir65Jp
         4G0/OrGRBvSylAGdDnSjt/rtnafWWj0Jak3i9FI4UiKW7Fyj2o0VJjKjtCr5zxb2okHB
         o2UZllWcZO7ScQQCuAILOlvL8igVTRk2XGDiTwcESgKDtSLQwUT2dMaxZxtdXe8H4Umx
         9fochV+UccxFkgHiMQXsV+X4sj7K0RGjB/+z6O6FQbMdEAOvLi09dLJgknLTBzoL2eq1
         1P5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDso5Ovcvs7WmXJKxh1zcsO/YXois8BAK1Mm8IX9xDIrP4iVJYZ
	P+AtosMs07W4bULORWkE38Pdxflo8eaxlOx8AN0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49+fTB38pYmrR9XHjwkD4DeDGBqqxu4uJL2LT4Pj4elipz7ObYcY8vNdtXHB8VeuELqR4X8Ldv1QK66UEIG7hI=
X-Received: by 10.129.200.11 with SMTP id n11mr5419096ywi.352.1522964244810;
 Thu, 05 Apr 2018 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.174.19 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABqy+sq94Jf8PmONhguYpu5PGA3=fOWyXSPcZjEARkQnfh72yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07B3CEBF44DEFBE3008080B72A0B639A@felloff.net> <CABqy+sq94Jf8PmONhguYpu5PGA3=fOWyXSPcZjEARkQnfh72yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 23:37:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XPj4=8zQ_+ucXyLFZav0wCLq3XSP+mxn=scpMte2-hGiA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9front] memfillpoly
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: transactional standard markup self-signing controller 

have you done any performance tests, or why are you contemplating
these kinds of optimizations?

On 4/5/18, Robert Ransom <rransom.8774@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/18, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net <cinap_lenrek@felloff.net> wrote:
>> memfillpoly is run in the kernel by devdraw. using fp there is
>> only supported on amd64 kernel right now.
>
> Oh.  Thanks.
>