From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29950 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2023 15:47:24 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Nov 2023 15:47:24 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]) by 9front; Mon Nov 27 10:45:03 -0500 2023 Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a011e9bf336so605329866b.3 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:45:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701099900; x=1701704700; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JM2c2HIXMW94U4RxGyKFJLUzcs6j5sIePVKt45YtpgI=; b=SCFEE9P9/YOcIAyN2Y0RkafI0Sb5hnALCthtR1sUg1L45ALdF4ACE72JAUIK4QccA7 Wd5TsxWnNyqFjmIWCQYrEItgoxPxOTTgVvrH7HFQ3jZoPTADOx5JB1IcqD/SlyA2/2gQ 8WGyaHYC5RpJyJmQFmPiRX5mNd9jsOSXemyqkzGC68mAY4+3EQ7qOx55FbSYm91NCEzy IfViMeETjKhu7px/HR4sybH/74xslmJUNqBQvg7lchePlUrzeE5i19IczXytvWspLf1b 1lUTjgKH3zNvjCcFxq61Zep5CLnXgEEAMMQYa7793Ctr8iDjROtpt090paeaO3ZUh5e6 KAkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701099900; x=1701704700; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JM2c2HIXMW94U4RxGyKFJLUzcs6j5sIePVKt45YtpgI=; b=PRYwNQ0TpeBVk/xFx0KLeOx0LwKkag9Ell/ZMuXFWklOPg9u2Vw5zNeivyl1GT8oGz ahZEig8t2k/78eTP7I9rS1CyFVMoqzqPMW3uCdQ+d7pW2ovSeHZDxV0v5r+26xwRe2at oNluBpnhliY2JXBO2v78058AEX7WUOUL0c5wdftUW0RXbGjrZOeh7jWNiid2f7l1zEzg oG2L+MYz3N8oc+Fgda6fLJWjbeX3AcMxneXxqaqyxWOy+xU/HbxN7AxAqngPzclFzVaq T9lfrIQ9I/+LoQtK7EMvI31FMkl+CW4BtUmjt9KW1ZBfyMjtRu7gs1/K6BB082UIsSRQ uzpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLHR5VX1Halj6rFRF3b0Ymp4rw76m4FZpLZT/nfGu71CUDI8nX aek51gXvYSXTk56LVy4iHMRXcy88Phpgj6HdokRpWYpL X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG+DEIu1UbUxQ/yZv7gyNc6I4QKBeDWfuSNbgxpl5dq7y90hAP1qG0oWKM+NCw27b8tSrm4DoCJOAZ6jIq4efk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b0a:b0:a01:a56f:f882 with SMTP id mp10-20020a1709071b0a00b00a01a56ff882mr9667645ejc.34.1701099899689; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:44:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <904397cf-6c3f-46c4-9139-7f80823ec064@invalid.invalid> <4eeba9d4-12f2-4938-b0b3-5a8404653282@posixcafe.org> <8708ecaa-0b89-430d-ad06-2fd272680660@invalid.invalid> In-Reply-To: From: Amavect Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:44:43 -0600 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: managed overflow-preventing shader firewall Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] Fix assert macro to not break on commas Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 4:47=E2=80=AFPM Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: > Is not it favorable to be proactive instead of reactive? Like all things, it depends. A valid assert expression (per ISO C) not compiling is such a small risk that being proactive isn't worth the added complexity. If you had a program that you wanted to compile, I would have no objections= . Thanks, Amavect