From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]) by pp; Tue Feb 24 12:10:56 EST 2015 Received: by labhs14 with SMTP id hs14so4494588lab.4 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:10:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2t1ZW6+PXHMUoyRdkiAqNXCs8Iuhj1+UX8afLATZySY=; b=bHNgBO/4xtB6//i93SkKemrNWDl1O8BKVfTRuzHOVf0+A9CiPDFW+4P4+G6zihG94b ddxJX2ARs50B2AvFg0mnYTUQHRHSYiav0Y0wcqu6BL4mc/l9u1h359vJpYZVA+KteU2g b5W0G5cPk0bC4DkuE5fbl3u1M3WEZqc3o2H7wfcd+XEJ8lCs4uRIPHvEVlHG7U06D4FC qG4tbsS2EjaSFD/hC63/0DBbk+v0FKIOjmR07koGhX7ZTWgDqpt+m654hVMNekvXdAbR XQ2kQOv3U1Vu1IsY1d7EFyXA0vFnF2JaHuBSdpoF/FfQrteYMB4IfSxo5Cd6Uu1YjOKe iJag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk559/UOZuiUI+LyTYMpKQY6Ih1MnN5hBShROAi3U068MfWYW3Jwnkax4CS0OIftCpZsYUp MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.146.66 with SMTP id ta2mr15643896lbb.0.1424797850589; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.12.37 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:10:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:10:50 +0100 Message-ID: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: SSL standard template CSS callback layer Subject: strange stats From: Giacomo Tesio To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I've noted a strange behaviour in stats during the system compilation. When I run `mk install` at the rio terminal, stats shows that load, context and syscalls grow to 100% untill the window buffer is full and then go down to the previous values. If I scroll down the window, the stats grow up again until the the window is full, than drop again. Instead if I send stdout to a file, that stats remain 100% till the compilation completes. Such behaviour makes me wonder if writing logs to the console is blocking the compiler. Is this the expected behaviour? Moreover, does the compiler benefit from multiple cores? `xl top` at xen dom0 shows the cpu usage of the 9front vm at 112% but I did expect it around 400%, since I assigned 4 cores to the system. Giacomo