From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]) by pp; Sat Feb 21 16:57:49 EST 2015
Received: by lbdu10 with SMTP id u10so12330679lbd.7
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:57:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=t0xayE4x3965LVq3qllY06GBxWS8SGTNFpsRgojpJj0=;
        b=J5ujbAITqdaGsy50zwZ9y5GUstn6t1XwwyfzPjhe9Fuiou7hs6x0fccWwt6rUkk5Af
         2uoGNaNo9Y6A8xAffA/xJHIlYzwLlIp6sJpMo40PCXxbvj/X5EbPfIsvKWXTvjYmeKPY
         vgSrZiPM/PhR+NXPgZ5VCJFZOyV/Iq8PDTOYSPKXDO9UwByzBvuFggJEE9YQdysne6EW
         nTlg0pYahRuj5vOAmUFdQlIfkz012mEQwtWJpotwdUiYZsyJQVDCVU0x2ksVLKBSriip
         MZiTnvcUoa4ljkCHw6xqHSeVjtpqKAbyPNUokEsXhiQ/Lj5FjcvX4oB5zOf5FYVsbIEH
         Gh0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHOuWYiaD470xcfeYbnN0c+cX5b+HW+4pkLYkGY/MOIG/hPYFpn4qZH29uznBQ3LKg9yol
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.56.139 with SMTP id a11mr3614583lbq.36.1424555863941;
 Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.12.37 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:57:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <76338756a4ebe97a86a866327776a744@felloff.net>
References: <CAHL7psF3LB74nnU6BJ1Js2duQHc42nQcna9URCQpaMA487PndA@mail.gmail.com>
	<76338756a4ebe97a86a866327776a744@felloff.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 22:57:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHL7psG6KHn4cF3x_W6fthm6Ur5Dro+8fL4mSJ60+9mXH-=ETw@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: overflow-preventing transactional core rich-client-based generator
Subject: Re: [9front] 9front on Xen 4.4 HVM
From: Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

It works! Finally! Thanks: this problem had alread stolen a few sleep
hours of mine during the last nights.

I managed to get it working with

vif = ['mac=00:16:3E:0A:15:65, model=virtio-net, bridge=xenbr0,
script=vif-bridge' ]

in the domU.cfg and *acpi= in the plan9.ini.

Now I can start with some more interesting tasks.


I'm wondering if *acpi= limit somehow the other cpus from working.


But, thanks you all!


Giacomo

2015-02-21 21:46 GMT+01:00  <cinap_lenrek@felloff.net>:
> just try *acpi= first. if that doesnt work, remove it and
> try *nomp= option. that should basically cover all combinations.
> the *nomsi= option makes only sense in mp mode (apic) but i never
> found the need for it. msi's usually just work when the hardware
> supports them, and even can work arround wrong mp tables as it
> bypasses the whole interrupt routing madness.
>
> --
> cinap