From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]) by pp; Tue Mar 17 06:11:03 EDT 2015 Received: by lbbzq9 with SMTP id zq9so3369647lbb.0 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pgWxzJ7Nc5Fkm43OSuNtwuT23GUulSX3aiEy8+qdsXI=; b=giKmKLh8qwbZgPdVHxLCU6MEeQgSfAfp1QA/INR4JAPNb8ULJUc2TS3xNRVTisj+vr o9+EMIgeL6t3JG3PAzL8hvmAzprlQ8R1s1qXONAB0J112SJSuPQEwdUM7n5qN77dhu3A hyInSaXhwI01v8ocxIXdd0BWOy3JGswzNU/PakCSbJ5lfhJbPSGd6NCl4xTQl3WtlzJ3 QjT7FlKxJqA7/ycTx0kAnos6B6LKIHFrBvTWcVeSBwbyuYkrg7aqNjGY2MnQj2tNKU4l EDsXqNQFPug5YmdQAkF1hAKBs5CfXvVag343/PJ+CTY7ZAdMdD2Cey1u3bthrgRNa49M z9PA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4AP2fjGN4iUIs2wkQ5YBquGXbeAhK1hhI1F7KrBcTfkSsvY4lcqjhJbWtBDwoE8djCYS7 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.30.7 with SMTP id o7mr57962218lah.22.1426587056916; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.172.49 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:10:56 +0100 Message-ID: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: object-oriented open pipelining template hypervisor Subject: Is style(6) still relevant? From: Giacomo Tesio To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b43cc4ea2a0511792e08 --089e0160b43cc4ea2a0511792e08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >From style(6) > Plan 9 C code has its own conventions. You would do well to follow them. Is such statement still true, in 9front? Giacomo --089e0160b43cc4ea2a0511792e08 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From style(6)
=C2=A0
= Plan 9 C code has its own conventions.=C2=A0 You would do well to follow th= em.

Is such statement still true, in 9front= ?


Giacomo
--089e0160b43cc4ea2a0511792e08--