From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com ([209.85.221.49]) by ewsd; Mon Oct 19 12:17:44 -0400 2020
Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id n15so419287wrq.2
        for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=offblast-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=bAi3VQ5RTxSGTHTr/numb4Tft9xBf9r+4rUOoIEG77I=;
        b=XAJ/cuN6O2QgtO/VfLzSiv8clS04Ye4/w+unntT0rRZJYa4DDQXZJ69Lc6Goct3aPs
         pQHio3KBNYSjA8hhcT5iof19omygT4UhUIZkSmbmD8AESi2+Y5C9UyQge+citC5hGG/U
         Il6A506UtgMgW5+TEohlUQI35OhwkWo6OrRF+Hzd9F99GY/MuL+cTEcKyP9fhoLov8Mv
         ZjmvIJvyhq9hyQXu7tZAgRBKhe6oCG0gkPmjepcj03u7HjtOvjI5mTdus7JMU5528/+R
         L564qJKu/VHHMzlq6X77KtQh11FX/t4GEeKm0PG7GoZYBgBh6BtZRmTM4JMHwYnE87Uv
         Oz8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=bAi3VQ5RTxSGTHTr/numb4Tft9xBf9r+4rUOoIEG77I=;
        b=rqVycHBwOMcmf0Tk/C/gCf2/6ogrz0U80UIzaaWNXVYxclmlHI5XhL5Ph94cYboZBR
         vfwVbUgrEmnIgrV/lUyRfL+mAq3aMAKvqrjxftrJ13KMBqqUkBoCqb6jgb+rmUiOTaaD
         ts7gaeDfcA5EbbjI72Kp1+8cTNFWaNtT659yhOy+4mYLz9/MfZimMtcNq9q180YSPyXq
         +qVZ218ES/mtD3XmjdeUiYuJiTB4M2KgDqNJ5ZruM3aU8dWZ/E79NO+fcDwvcwnWiMRl
         RlU9XyIf4QV1d7LaA1VfxNxeA7y5RtWlrwRicDAhVmyhSBKGFCoS1OlN/yzZ24Xl0QRW
         3Aww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530k788y9vbZPNsUgxaEC4P53pwZQSeAALHH3QFpMdMmChm9ZEDZ
	VwuoUPRINGjR93aqT4VVJkKCcWa2KfmRsWBaAcGmS8TrDrvsjw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwadCFff3aGesbESz+mKAABJECFPYPV8OAdsqB6z6Z3QrG9a7wlEDmyrfaqUC+sowqNjkh17naGfjiuTpfUUJc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5748:: with SMTP id q8mr293388wrw.299.1603124257901;
 Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH_zEu4+2asD-aY4ZBRgiNw6EB9sQOibOZJC+za4TuERzVGN3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_zEu4+2asD-aY4ZBRgiNw6EB9sQOibOZJC+za4TuERzVGN3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Owens <mischief@offblast.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:17:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH_zEu6oozz9L3b0UEgoJWYkg9G5r7rNbTFEu-cR1WbOmF1FsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug: sdnvme blindly initializes conf.nmach submission queues
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: responsive SOAP over HTML full-stack-scale singleton 

this was fixed in fb315d5d205e and in the latest release.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 7:30 PM Nick Owens <mischief@offblast.org> wrote:
>
> i have new SB-RKTQ4-1TB nvme disks.
>
> the 9front kernel fails to initialize the disk because sdnvme attempts
> to create one submission queue per CPU, but my ryzen 1700X has 8c/16t
> and the disk only has 8 completion queues and 8 submission queues:
>
> root@abacus:/home/mischief# nvme get-feature /dev/nvme1n1 -f 0x7
> get-feature:0x7 (Number of Queues), Current value:0x070007
>
> thus, my disks don't work at all in 9front.