Re: Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

[Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

Looks like an interesting project and I wouldn't be surprised if Rob and
Co. aren't at least considering what comes after Plan9. Something will.

I was never suggesting such a solution.

I should have perhaps begun with something along the lines of ...

I consider that changing bio to meet a specific need and adding flags to
enable the new functionality is not a very forward looking solution.

Have fun guys and ask Cinap what it was like to work and fool around in
Australia.

brucee

On 5 May 2017 at 23:25, Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
> >
> > sl
> >
>
> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
> and designed) code.
>
> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>
> - Dave
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1830 bytes --]