Now you are just putting words in my (and Cinaps's) mouths. Please read: https://golang.org/pkg/io/ brucee On 6 May 2017 at 03:59, Julius Schmidt wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 May 2017, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > Looks like an interesting project and I wouldn't be surprised if Rob and >> Co. aren't at least considering what comes after Plan9. Something will. >> I was never suggesting such a solution. >> >> I should have perhaps begun with something along the lines of ... >> >> I consider that changing bio to meet a specific need and adding flags to >> enable the new functionality is not a very forward looking solution. >> > > Translation: Don't touch the artwork. Wait for rob to create next artwork > instead. Preferably in Golang. > > Flags to fix buffering are an ugly hack but the only better solution I can > think of asynchronous buffering, which is impossible to implement in Plan > 9, at least transparently. > > You also misunderstood the purpose of the bio fix. It's not just for > buffering, it's an attempt to make bio more generally applicable. > > Have fun guys and ask Cinap what it was like to work and fool around in >> Australia. >> > > If it was anything like this thread, I pity him already. > > > >> brucee >> >> On 5 May 2017 at 23:25, Dave MacFarlane wrote: >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber < >> sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote: >> > >> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> > >> > sl >> > >> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel >> much >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled >> with >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >> and designed) code. >> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >> >> - Dave >> >> >> >> >>