Ha, sounds great! Well, thanks for taking a look at the binaries. Good luck
Rudolf!

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
wrote:

> On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Marshall Conover <marzhall.o@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > When I was last working on things a month or so ago, I believe the build
> problem with building go on 9front was related to mismatched type
> declarations; that is, certain types were declared in 9front as being
> uint_32 or the like, and in go being uint_64, or something of that nature.
> The details have escaped me, but the binaries may be the simplest method,
> because they're (hopefully) just plug-and-play.
>
> Perform the empirical test. Building on amd64 works fine. Building on 386
> is broken since 1.4.3 and now even building 1.4.2 fails. The trivial fixes
> mentioned have not been verified, documented, nor applied upstream.
>
> The 386 binaries in question suicide on 9front. Fish and others are well
> aware of this since at least 1.5 but nobody does anything to address the
> problem. We just tell people who don't know any better that everything
> works great.
>
> Welcome to the Plan 9 community.
>
> sl
>
>
>