From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lost.goblin@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.110.2 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <81fd2f60-5548-4a8b-a3ef-dfc4799ff43d@h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <81fd2f60-5548-4a8b-a3ef-dfc4799ff43d@h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 19:07:34 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 93XzBzjBkK4mxgeCOAUo9NvX99o
Message-ID: <CAK=G1ThsoB8dKg2r7317QySWVZqmLMNUyp3UbKO7Y+zUZ3+rgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DDE - interesting or horrible?
From: Uriel <uriel@berlinblue.org>
To: 9front@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

No.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, staalmannen <staal1978@gmail.com> wrote:
> The L4 guys [1] (and later the HURD guys [2, 3]) have apparently been
> able to re-use some linux drivers through a library-based approach.
> Would a similar approach be interesting as a temporary way to get a
> wider range of drivers fast-and-dirty ported to a Plan9 kernel?
>
> [1] http://wiki.tudos.org/DDE/DDEKit
> [2] http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/user/zhengda.html
> [3] http://www.archhurd.org/