From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13621 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2022 20:19:13 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Oct 2022 20:19:13 -0000 Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Sun Oct 16 16:17:26 -0400 2022 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([104.59.85.219]) by gaff; Sun Oct 16 16:17:26 -0400 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Stanley Lieber Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: References: <02952C02-9229-495D-844D-7D86035C6C96@musolino.id.au> In-Reply-To: <02952C02-9229-495D-844D-7D86035C6C96@musolino.id.au> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 16:17:24 -0400 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19H12) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: enhancement extension Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] hget: file name detection Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk a custom shell script wrapper does seem like the best option, since the user= is the final authority on their own preferences. imo, > redirection obviate= s the need for more flags. sl > On Oct 16, 2022, at 4:03 PM, Alex Musolino wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >>=20 >> I can repro this with wget and OpenBSD ftp, >> maybe that's a common issue? >=20 > Perhaps, but we=E2=80=99re not trying to be bug-for-bug compatible with th= ese other programs. >=20 >=20 >=20