From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.161.31.183]) by ewsd; Fri Mar 16 14:00:04 EDT 2018 Received: from [10.14.22.200] ([166.170.220.9]) by 5ess; Fri Mar 16 14:00:03 EDT 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [9front] Argument lists in Plan 9 man pages From: Stanley Lieber X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100) In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:00:01 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5727ED416549AF09B9CA5BAFD544869E@5ess.inri.net> To: 9front@9front.org List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: service cache On Mar 16, 2018, at 11:45 AM, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > They are meant to be read also for getting an overview of the system. Are you saying: Man pages are not a reference work because they are meant to provide informa= tion about the system. Or something else? This is going to sound rude: Maybe you could try embedding your message insi= de long paragraphs. If it=E2=80=99s good enough for enumerating flag options= , it might work here. I don=E2=80=99t agree that a tabulated list of flag options is at odds with p= roviding an overview of the system. The same information is still being prov= ided, whichever format is ultimately used. sl