From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8614 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2022 16:33:36 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Jun 2022 16:33:36 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Thu Jun 9 12:31:54 -0400 2022 Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-225.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.225]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 064b78ac (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 09:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:31:44 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <41499E0C845E5125DEB144C0198E2753@pixelhero.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: leveraged high-performance-scale HTML over JSON table standard-based service Subject: Re: [9front] iounit: bump it across the board Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth noam@pixelhero.dev: > > Are those buffers static? If they're dynamically allocated, I > doubt it'd be an issue; I'm thinking of a use case where e.g. > file systems use large iounit but drivers use a small one. > > That seems best of both worlds: minimal consumption where more > isn't needed, higher resource usage where it's beneficial and > cheap. Try it out and report back -- tuning this easily is why I added the constant to libc.