From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FROM_FMBLA_NEWDOM28,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 21301 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2022 05:50:04 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Aug 2022 05:50:04 -0000
Received: from mars.pulpie.xyz ([104.238.162.80]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 01:48:39 -0400 2022
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcp80.org; s=20211202;
	t=1660801712;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=QS/xdhfFqXuSrMzhTStJGEVx2VZaWo305HLcyQEbmSY=;
	b=DtBnL2nzR2yKwD2E+eifgTCHZs7xpv20qiNiFU6x0Yp1jeJeV/s+8dnbdXzbDoXBiNlWJk
	JTzldPgTdIyvn5ZuEUlXGwoGG85OsDpnGCtaC0FwzHqaDkWXpakEC0kYQpXeR7CZC0O1rR
	31H8Hw81DZ4UBx6W0ObDHku8YGTP9ok=
X-Rspamd-Server: mars.pulpie.xyz
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 98036629
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.40 / 15.00];
	MV_CASE(0.50)[];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
	DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[tcp80.org:s=20211202];
	RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[];
	RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
	FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com];
	FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com];
	RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
Received: from localhost (deimos.pulpie.xyz [172.16.32.2])
	by mars.pulpie.xyz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 98036629 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:48:32 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: <meta.jxy@gmail.com>
From: "B. Atticus Grobe" <grobe0ba@tcp80.org>
To: <9front@9front.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:44:56 -0500
Message-Id: <CM8WZUSGRWPX.2DAD8NILGNP97@aphrodite.pulpie.local>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.11.0-91-g1b91b68e7385
References: <097C7F14-7AE8-4187-B043-C0BC164FE53B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <097C7F14-7AE8-4187-B043-C0BC164FE53B@gmail.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: structured immutable AJAX over ACPI standard-scale grid-scale locator 
Subject: Re: [9front] dangerous Exit menu item in sub-rio
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

There are plenty of good reasons for wanting to close a sub-rio, but
keep the window, for instance, to preserve the namespace you've built
there for testing or other reasons.

Having a confirmation of some sort was discussed and rejected. While the
other options require multiple clicks, that is because they require
further inputs. The Exit option does not. No other options require
confirmation beyond the necessary inputs for them to function.

I've been using a version of this that always has an Exit option in rio
since before it was merged, and haven't managed to click Exit accidentally
even once.

If its a problem for you, just patch your local rio.