From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 14113 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2022 19:28:52 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Nov 2022 19:28:52 -0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by 9front; Tue Nov 29 14:25:11 -0500 2022 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA70F240027 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:25:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1669749907; bh=ZXg6lAxVdckYvJ/s8Np4wrCRDatP5jTAsNYvz0WdhSI=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:From; b=QpVnVmbguPQgRSoLD01eucaekxYHSAObHTcEzgd9Nbv+7QqtYDf75c2vKwGEzzDuB zdywYp8ppBf9fz1kgIKZfMMxd9oPsEoOAoFAaDLXKQ8MGdq2WOiBreZE/AgP1Dqqq7 T+Ju5b3UcTqG8jla3Z9CPKACDjOf4IdHT+khxOCXEBXnvOwg5PpYrMl+Tn2SnkRg4j 2akWugrDl4WZkRydA6t6Atr01DF71ogRVL8ms2E47sHrXdLN+VjUjKpzkOUliB0g0r l6yI8mqgQkFmPNti6XgVLbSc9CoN73lLajJtBa79ZHl25cLpoNOi+QAKTsDNbc958d O6wwW9mqTG7NA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NMC3407Z3z9rxR for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:25:02 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:23:48 +0000 Message-Id: From: "Tom Schwindl" To: <9front@9front.org> References: <51022878-2dcf-42be-9990-60f2d1475ce5@sirjofri.de> <0df780bc-37c8-4f01-8c40-aa50e83d0573@sirjofri.de> <2aa0db47-52f7-4449-8e53-e5f43fade278@sirjofri.de> In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: engine-oriented SSL singleton method-oriented control Subject: Re: [9front] 9front on the Allwinner A64 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue Nov 29, 2022 at 7:59 PM CET, adventures in9 wrote: > I also got the RockPro64, which uses the same rk3399 cpu the Pinephone > Pro and Pinebook Pro uses. So it is also in line for getting a > kernel. It does look like it will be a bit more of a challenge, since > it seems to have a reputation for poor battery life, so playing with > the power management will be important. > I'll definitely look into it as soon as I got some spare time. I also stumbled across this link[1] which lists a number of resources that look pretty helpful. [1] https://www.netbsd.org/~mrg/rk3399/ -- Best Regards, Tom Schwindl