From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mxout012.mail.hostpoint.ch ([217.26.49.172]) by ewsd; Mon Apr 6 06:47:40 EDT 2020 Received: from [10.0.2.46] (helo=asmtp013.mail.hostpoint.ch) by mxout012.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jLPHp-0000sB-N8 for 9front@9front.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:47:25 +0200 Received: from 84-74-148-26.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.74.148.26] helo=t430s.home.eff0ff.net) by asmtp013.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jLPHp-000N89-84 for 9front@9front.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:47:25 +0200 X-Authenticated-Sender-Id: mike@eff0ff.net Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] call for testing Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:47:24 +0200 From: mike@eff0ff.net In-Reply-To: <737E73E194224FFD817889194270367D@wopr.sciops.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: extensible configuration generator Can confirm, t420 now boots 9pc successfully. > Hello, > > So far, no issues with the machines I've tested with pc64 > (w500/t61(p), w520, x220). > For w520 and x220, I tested 386 kernel as well, without issues. > This was with latest changes, including rampage() bugfix. > > Perhaps the t420 failure reported earlier is now fixed as well. > > Cheers, > > qwx