From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Mon Sep 21 13:51:55 EDT 2020 Received: from abbatoir.fios-router.home (pool-74-101-2-6.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.101.2.6]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e857ed12 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] test Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:51:46 -0700 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <5F0A6AD0-ECFA-4383-B0F6-4C3EB0508B1B@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: metadata descriptor configuration interface >> >>That leaves us 3 options: >> >> 1. Strip out DKIM entirely from forwarded emails. >> 2. Don't mess with any headers we don't need to >> 3. Implement DKIM, munge to our heart's content, >> and re-sign. >> > > how does every other mailing list in the world manage modifying the subject line? > > sl From a non-comprehensive survey (some google groups, 9fans): Option 3: they rewrite stuff and sign it again with their own key. OpenBSD mailing lists forward without munging.