From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Mon Sep 21 13:51:55 EDT 2020
Received: from abbatoir.fios-router.home (pool-74-101-2-6.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.101.2.6])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e857ed12 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <D095AD98AB8AD09A826A8A56B32C5953@eigenstate.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] test
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:51:46 -0700
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <5F0A6AD0-ECFA-4383-B0F6-4C3EB0508B1B@stanleylieber.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: metadata descriptor configuration interface 

>>
>>That leaves us 3 options:
>>
>>	1. Strip out DKIM entirely from forwarded emails.
>>	2. Don't mess with any headers we don't need to
>>	3. Implement DKIM, munge to our heart's content,
>>	   and re-sign.
>>
> 
> how does every other mailing list in the world manage modifying the subject line?
> 
> sl

 From a non-comprehensive survey (some google groups,
9fans): Option 3: they rewrite stuff and sign it again
with their own key.

OpenBSD mailing lists forward without munging.