From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB4F222EF for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 02:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.82.67]) by 9front; Fri Jul 26 20:49:02 -0400 2024 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:49:00 -0400 From: sl@stanleylieber.com To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <061c546d-9321-43dc-b4f8-97b9432443c2@posixcafe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: extended session self-signing layer Subject: Re: [9front] WANTED: ip based filtering of incoming connections Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > You are only allowed a single mask, not a mask per value. > So we take the input, AND it just once and then check if it matches any of the given values. > This is a bit strange, but it does seem to be intentional. ah... someone even already tried to explain this to me in this very thread. thanks! sl