From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D588A28A59 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 10:58:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out-176.mta1.migadu.com ([95.215.58.176]) by 9front; Mon Aug 5 04:57:54 -0400 2024 Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pixelhero.dev; s=key1; t=1722848273; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4reGwQ05HW1r5prg+ReJJnJxceQZUUsYgPtQ2MQkUbc=; b=aAiktHRzGkqcrKDJk23MV0iB0DTE+6h+8ZTX0Myk7sg51wIgl8znw/0F+92njghJmx95tn VGUL+QBWaktYjna259SzJn77VGcdQ9YcJjjeI0Sm8+TuT3kxoZyc0fDogvGh06POt8/Z4D EWg/yf1PlqJp1T+jAurXTE2mzh8TuZavCeAyvA09cpBqB3btiteyKNPsagPQ6Yk0LgasGj 1Mmp40AOxssQzQp80rMIREWLtN9hHKK8nmUONmCmld/ms9dOli7otgwQ08nFuj+ZMfNMF5 uZY8XgA4HCzJQWaSc0ih52agHlfHyA7swVmCAahYtT+omP0lKPGz4b2zYAzkyA== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 03:57:49 -0500 Message-Id: X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Noam Preil" To: <9front@9front.org> References: <7003a121-ae98-4a24-b0dc-778c3b086310@sirjofri.de> In-Reply-To: <7003a121-ae98-4a24-b0dc-778c3b086310@sirjofri.de> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: mobile structured cache-oriented self-signing metadata base dependency frontend Subject: Re: [9front] Thoughts on Wayland? Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Of course, for e.g. treason, it's trickier, since frame buffers are decoded on the CPU side, and the entire frame buffer gets uploaded to devdraw. Best case, with gpufs, would be tossing the encoded data instead - which _would_ be a major bandwidth reduction. That might actually be sufficient for treason over 9p?